Content posted on this page should only pertain to improving the article itself.
For all other types of discussion, please post them in the forums.
This includes (but is not limited to) theories, fanon images, discussion about how great someone is, fanon stories, etc. You have been warned.

Remember to sign your post by typing four tildes: (~~~~) Forum newClick here to start a new topic.



Someone might want to update Princess Bubblegum's icon in light of the recent events within the series. BNSF1995, Alive since 1995 00:00, May 6, 2011 (UTC)

Add Beemo?

I think Beemo should be added to this template.

--Spartan-112: The Unforgiven 05:10, September 7, 2011 (UTC)

I agree. It had a major role in 6 episodes, and will have it's backstory revealed in a later episode, making 7 known major appearances. It is also seen in several episodes were it had some interesting involvement in the episode. Plus, it lives with Finn and Jake, so why not? Sky Monster 23:38, February 19, 2012 (UTC)

Does anyone agree? If anyone else does, then I will add Beemo. Sky Monster 00:21, February 25, 2012 (UTC) I agree. MrBMO


Since we're now considering Flame Princess a main character, should we add her to this template? BNSF1995, Alive since 1995 02:52, April 3, 2012 (UTC)

Seconded. She's sure more important than LSP atm. 15:44, April 30, 2013 (UTC)

Add Flame Princess

Now we know that Flame Princess is a new main/recurring character and Finn's new love interest, they should put her in the main character section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[Message Wall:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]]) . Please sign your posts with ~~~~


I do not think that Flame Princess should be added as a main character. So far as of 2/14/13 she has only been in 6 episodes. For much of season four she was Finn's love intrest but she has not shown up in any new episodes lately. Whenever she is near Finn she is a danger. It does not seem like Finn and Flame Princess could have a real relationship without harming each other.

Since many other characters such as Tree Trunks have been in many more episodes than Flame Princess and are still just minor characters, I do not see how Flame princess deserves to be a main character. She should just be a minor character. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talkcontribs)

Please remember to sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~). ƒelinoel (Talk) 45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 16:27, February 15, 2013 (UTC)

I second Flame Princess as main character. She's had more screentime than LSP in S4/5 and is the most important relative to Finn next to jake. That makes her definitely more important than LSP and worthy of being a main char. 15:41, April 30, 2013 (UTC)

Should the Lich be added?

Really, if we placed FP here, why not the Lich? after all, even his own page describes him as a "major antagonist" and think about it: 

Excluding cameos, Flame Princess has been starring in 4 episodes, and again, excluding cameos, the Lich has been in 5. I don't know why Flame Princess holds more relevance than him and really, the Lich is in no way a minor figure in Adventure Time. ( 13:52, January 17, 2013 (UTC))

Because he is a major antagonist does not mean he is a major character. ƒelinoel (Talk) 45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 14:46, January 17, 2013 (UTC)

Flame Princess

I believe we should add Flame Princess in the template. She has appeared quite an amount of episodes, she has as much as appearances as Lumpy Space Princess and Marceline ever since her introduction and plays a huge role in the series. Heck, the template appears on her page and she is the said category!

So, does anyone agree? 180px-Chrell btts Being boring is boring. 250px-2423266537 bb6495420e o 02:44, June 10, 2013 (UTC)

A lot of people believe this but it is the crats who get to decide, try to post on Tavis' page or something about it. ƒelinoel (Talk) 45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 19:00, June 10, 2013 (UTC)

Add Lemongrab

Lemongrab has appeared in 4 episodes already 5 if you count his toy from All the Little People, and he's about to make another appearance in the episode Another Five More Short Graybles. No Minor Character would do that. He should be a character on this template because he's a main character. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talkcontribs) 00:11, June 17, 2013‎. Please sign your posts with ~~~~

I think the Earl and the Flame Princess are on the edge of being main characters... possibly but you know... maybe not? Ultimately you would have to convince a crat for them to be added though. ƒelinoel (Talk) 45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 14:54, June 19, 2013 (UTC)
Lemongrab is more of an recurring character rather than a main. TheMostBoringManInTheWorld 17:01, June 20, 2013‎ (UTC)
That is possible, yeah. ƒelinoel (Talk) 45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 13:03, July 9, 2013 (UTC)

Cinamon Bun

Should Cinnamon Bun be Added? Cinnamon Bun has had six major roles in the show so far and appears in alot of episodes. Maybe he should be added as a main character? ATSuperFan123 (talk) 20:54, August 23, 2013 (UTC)

Why not? Cinamon bun has had five major roles already and and every episode that is not a major role, he has alot of them. Maybe he should become a major character? —Preceding unsigned comment added by felinoel (talkcontribs)

Please remember to sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~).
Nah. He still looks like a recurring character to me. TheMostBoringManInTheWorld (talk) 11:52, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
Even though he is totally going to become a duke or an earl or something like that now, I agree. The main characters are a special title that has never really followed any sort of pattern or rules. ƒelinoel (Talk) 45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 20:07, September 11, 2013 (UTC)

As of now, Cinnamon Bun has has a bug story arc behind him. He began as a half-baked idiot who worked as Princess Bubblegum's servant in the Candy Kingdom and then he became Flame Princess' servant and then went through development and became fully-baked and is now this strong and loyal fighter and also became a wise "father-figure" sort of speak for Bun Bun. He's also appeared in more episodes now and he now has as much major roles as Lady Rainicorn. I think he's become a major character now. Boyariffic (talk) 21:59, May 23, 2016 (UTC)

Main/Major Characters

I feel like that we should add Flame Princess to the character navigation for the main characters. And maybe it is nice to add a new template with the major reccuring characters, the ones that aren't really main characters, but are close to it. For example one with: Tree Trunks (13), Lemongrab (13), Cinnamon Bun (24), Peppermint Butler (28), Gunter (18) and Snail. The numbers represent their episode appearances btw.

I also thought of other characters like Shelby (9), Hunson (5), Abracadaniel (4), Magic Man (4), Neptr (5) and The Lich (5). But they might have to less episodes to be in. DarKingdomHearts (talk) 20:00, December 19, 2013 (UTC)

I think we need to redesign the categories. ƒelinoel (Talk) 45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 05:29, December 20, 2013 (UTC)

ATSuperFan123 (talk) 01:50, January 15, 2014 (UTC) I agree. I know it sounds like this has been said for the thousanth time already, but, I think Flame Princess has appeared in enough episodes to make her a main character. She's had 7 major roles already and ahe plays such a big role in Finn's life and the Adventure Time storyline. This over all things is the one most major thing that should be changed in the main character template. Also, the idea about there being another template for recurring characters isn't half bad. We might be able to do something like that. I also think that Jake Jr. (4) and Peppermint Butler (25) have enough to be recurring characters too. The biggest thing we need to change though is adding Flame Princess as a main character. So we really do need to update the characters category.

Update to CharacterNav

When I go to main character's page, Lady Rainicorn isn't there. I am not arguing Lady should be, as she is more of a side/reoccuring character rather than a major one. But the NavBox for main characters still includes Lady Rainicorn, and I cannot change it because I have no authoritization to do so. SwegWrestlur (talk) 00:10, July 14, 2016 (UTC)SwegWrestlur

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.