Click here to edit page
- To vote, simply post *{{Support}} and sign with ~~~~ under the answer you are supporting. You can always change it at anytime, until the end date by using the {{Unvote}} template.
- To vote against an answer, simply post *{{Oppose}} and sign with ~~~~ under the it to symbolize your opposition. When voting against an answer it is recommended you post a short description of why. You can always change it at anytime, until the end date by using the {{Unvote}} template.
- If you would like to give a new option or even just make a little comment that is neither for nor against what you are commenting on, use the *{{Neutral}} tag before it.
- An example of unvoting in use would be *{{Unvote|{{Support}}}}. This shows up as
Support — - Votes made by users not logged in (including regular anons) will not be counted.
- Voting ends once four days pass and there have been no new votes (except during ties).
- Unless five days pass and the vote is unanimous, then the vote ends.
- If the available options to vote for are not what you want, go ahead and add another option and vote for it.
It has come to my attention that a certain article has been renominated over and over and over and over again and hasn't even won once.
I propose a change to the rule that states that winning nominations may not be renominated until two months after they have won, the change is that winning nominations will have to wait three months AND losing nominations will have to wait one.
Questions? Comments? Snide remarks?
VOTE HERE[]
- Support — File:Gotta Kill 'Em All!. ƒelinoel_
13:54, October 3, 2013 (UTC) - Support — It is kind of annoying to see the same few all the time. FIame Princess (talk) 05:16, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
- Support — I completely agree. It does get annoying. Particularly Lumpy Space Princess must be nominated every month. --Yuzura☆炎のマスター 14:19, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
- Support — TheMostBoringManInTheWorld (talk) 15:08, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
- Support — Let's get some variety in the nominations, k?
(Profile|wall) 15:27, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
|
Voting Closed. |
| Place no more votes.
The time limit has passed and this voting thread is now closed. The choice that passed was to the one supplied. |
Propose changes here[]
|
Personally I was thinking something else. For instance, if an article gets nominated three months in a row and gets rejected every time, it must wait 3 or more months before it can get nominated again, Because all these LSP nominations are just getting to be spam at this point and taking up room where another candidate could be. Heeeeeeeeeeeere's JOHNNY !!! 14:01, October 3, 2013 (UTC) |
- I dunno, seems a bit too complicated and unusable to me... File:Gotta Kill 'Em All!. ƒelinoel_ 14:02, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
- I just don't think one month is going to be a long enough wait time for the loser articles. They will just keep getting nominated every other month, which is still spammy. Heeeeeeeeeeeere's JOHNNY !!! 14:04, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
- If you think about it, that means they will only get nominated three times every half of a year. That seems like a small enough happening to me. File:Gotta Kill 'Em All!. ƒelinoel_ 15:33, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
- If you think about it, that means they will only get nominated three times every half of a year. That seems like a small enough happening to me. File:Gotta Kill 'Em All!. ƒelinoel_
- I just don't think one month is going to be a long enough wait time for the loser articles. They will just keep getting nominated every other month, which is still spammy. Heeeeeeeeeeeere's JOHNNY !!! 14:04, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
Stop nominating articles that have won in the past wtf are you doing. 
The 2nd Law 01:08, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
- You mean entirely? Hmm. File:Gotta Kill 'Em All!. ƒelinoel_ 05:14, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
- That sounds like the best solution to me. TheMostBoringManInTheWorld (talk) 14:13, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
- This forum isn't even supposed to be addressing the winners though. The issue lies with the losing articles getting renominated over and over again. Heeeeeeeeeeeere's JOHNNY !!! 14:33, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
- I see. Kay den. TheMostBoringManInTheWorld (talk) 15:04, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
- True TheMost, good point. File:Gotta Kill 'Em All!. ƒelinoel_ 13:17, October 7, 2013 (UTC)
- True TheMost, good point. File:Gotta Kill 'Em All!. ƒelinoel_
- I see. Kay den. TheMostBoringManInTheWorld (talk) 15:04, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
- This forum isn't even supposed to be addressing the winners though. The issue lies with the losing articles getting renominated over and over again. Heeeeeeeeeeeere's JOHNNY !!! 14:33, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
- That sounds like the best solution to me. TheMostBoringManInTheWorld (talk) 14:13, October 6, 2013 (UTC)