Adventure Time Wiki
Adventure Time Wiki

20100401212842!Wiki.png

Forums: Index > Watercooler > Flame princess is a human
Wikia's forums are a place for the community to discuss subjects with other members. Remember sign your post with four tildes: ~~~~
Forum newClick here to edit page



Hey guys this is my first topic in this wikia. I noticed things that Proofs that fp is a human.

Non of flame kingdoms people look like her, some of them are made of rocks or pure flame. Even her father doesn't look like her, some of you know that when parents have a child. The child should look 25% like there parents. This shows that this is not her real father. In the episode earth and water, when flame princess had a flashback, her father didn't care for her risk. This even shows the same thing as I said before. I think she must be one of the survivors from the mushroom war. Anyway here is my question what is that gem on her fore head? In my thoughts this must be the problem for her being Fire elemental. This shows why fp was in the cage, her father was afraid for her to go out of flame kingdom, because someone could know that she's a human by removing the gem.

Well here is my topic I will be surfing through the Internet to find more bye.

  • Have to disagree, as no human could survive her body temperature. Plus she can become gigantic or tiny at will. Sure Wizards can do that, but like in LotR, Wizards are concidered a race seperate from humans. Now I'll give the possibility that she coudl be half Human or Wizard on her mother's side, though the most likely answer is  "female monsters/aliens/mutants/furries always look more human so they're more physically appealing," which is a tired old trope. The gem is probably either like a Bindi or a tiara, but may have something to do with keeping her power in check. As we should all know by now, everyone's parents in this series are amusingly sucky; Jake's not the best dad, his dad was pretty self absorbed & caused more problewms than he solved, Finn's dad has no sence of responsibility or comittment, Bubblegum's parents were the villain in a game, & Marceline's dad doesn't respect her decisions. Likalaruku (talk)


Until we find out who or what FP's mother is, we will not be able to say for sure if she is partly human or not. Assuming Flame King is her biological father (so far, there seems to be no evidence against this), she is at least half fire elemental, or whatever Flame King is.

As far as the gem goes, we know it isn't one of the Enchiridion's gems of power, as it wasn't used to open the portal to the multiverse. That possiblity is out. I have nothing else on that topic.

Interesting point on Likalaruku's part there: A lot of parents have been pretty creepy / outright evil so far. Why is that?

Voron2000 (talk) 00:23, January 6, 2015 (UTC)

A lot of the Flame People are very diverse and different. Saying that Flame Princess doesn't look like her father proves nothing. She doesn't even look like some of her brothers. dave strider // knight of time 01:01, January 6, 2015 (UTC)

  • cough she could be adopted cough* (note: I haven't seen the episode where she befriends CB) The lego mind (talk) 02:09, January 6, 2015 (UTC)

I have to agree with Giaria  a lot of princesses look diffrent from their supjects even each other. The two breakfast princesses are even wildly different and their sisters. Why would they adopt a human and turn it into a flame person? Not only that if he was "afraid" her being human would be discovered why would he let  Jake (pretending to be Finn) woo her? Which he willingly let's her come out of her cage to greet fake Finn. Even if we could say "yeah maybe" she proven to be very loyal to her people. I can't see her abandoning her people leaving then into the questionable leadership of her brothers to run off with a guy who she has no reason to take back after the way her treated her. I honestly think she is perfect the way she is.

Roconza 07:41, January 11, 2015 (UTC)

FP is definitely a flame person... What kind of human can transform into a giant, incredibly destructive wall of fire? Considering everything that has been said, I'm pretty sure it's safe to say the wiki's current entry is completely correct.

Voron2000 (talk) 02:47, January 12, 2015 (UTC)