Talk: User Rights

Merge

OK, I merged an existing article with the new administration article. I altered the text a little bit to remove the part about being "elite" and "noble." That language made me a little uncomfortable. Also, I changed the part saying "at least the last month." I don't think we should set a specific time period like that. Other than that, looks pretty good.--Cornprone 07:45, May 24, 2011 (UTC)

Seats

I created the table to keep track of how many admins there are. how many seats do you all think we should have for each section? (this is to limit the amount of admins to prevent us from having too many admins and so people who are admin-wannabes will see that theres no open space and won't bother us.--Tavisource 23:00, April 4, 2012 (UTC)

By the way, User:SaberSworn asked if he could be a maintenance admin, I was going to promote him, by since I'm a fairly young admin, I'm having some trouble. How do you make someone a maintenance admin?

The Fire Rises 23:06, April 4, 2012 (UTC)

I would suggest having all tables full at any given time. If some person becomes a particularly exemplary member and deserves more rights, simply add another seat. So long as it isn't common knowledge that such a method is in place, that should stop people from asking so much. Naturally if this method is chosen then this comment should go byebye. Flame Prince Finn 23:16, April 4, 2012 (UTC)

I think the current number or fewer would be good. I'm a believer in what it says on the article: that the wiki should only have as many admins as it takes to perform the 3 primary duties of an admin, which are simply to 1) delete unwanted pages, 2) lock pages that need protection, and 3) block disruptive users. That's all. Admins are not authorities or some kind of government hierarchy. They're just people entrusted with the use of those 3 buttons. --Cornprone 00:40, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

I like that the admin table has a note that states "the rankings are based on the order that the users received their rights and does not imply a hierarchical standing." I agree with that. In fact, I'd prefer it if the "seats" were not numbered at all. --Cornprone 07:40, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

Me too, I don't like that, it makes people assume that some admins are "better" than other ones.

The Fire Rises 11:07, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

I think we would need more than just seven chat mods, if there is one thing I see far too often here is people complaining about what goes on when there are no mods around, I try to tell them to take a screenshot next time but as a graphic artist I am inclined to be very doubtful when it comes to screenshots...

As for all the other positions I am for either keeping the same amount or losing some. felinoel 16:16, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

Page Redesign

I think we need a page redesign, I mentioned this to Corn a bit ago but here it is here.

Admins and crats would get their own article, as well as rollbacks, task force, and chat mods.

All info on these pages are from this original one, except for the how to become info, that was made up mostly and if not liked can be just removed.

_{I took this design from another wiki so there may be a dead link or two that tries to take you there, just ignore that for now, this is just an initial design.}

felinoel 16:10, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

Oh... just took a look at the seats thing <.<; felinoel 16:12, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

Inactive?

Why is Sparda listed as inactive? He's still around.

The Fire Rises 16:40, May 4, 2012 (UTC)

I am technically inactive though. My laptop stopped working. The only reason I'm still able to do anything on here is because of the school computers, but that'll be over soon. My last exam of the semester is Monday, and the final day of school is Wednesday. After that, I'm not sure how long it will be before I can get on again. --Legendary Dark Knight 16:49, May 4, 2012 (UTC)

Note the edit summary he gave when he did that.

http://adventuretime.wikia.com/index.php?title=Adventure_Time_Wiki%3AAdministrators&action=historysubmit&diff=202486&oldid=201129

ƒelinoel (Talk) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Wikia_Logo.svg/45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 17:28, May 4, 2012 (UTC)

There should be a little summary next to or below his title so we know first glance. -- Bunai82 ^(talk) 17:32, May 4, 2012 (UTC)

Should there? What does inactive mean anyways? I always saw it as gone for now but will be back later, if this is the case then I don't think we need that... ƒelinoel (Talk) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Wikia_Logo.svg/45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 17:40, May 4, 2012 (UTC)

Not active (lol)

Or rather, not as active as the User is expected to be, if you contact them don't expect a quick reply back, or blocks or page moves etc. I'm also admin on Vocaloid wiki, and I placed the admins into "active / occasionally active / inactive". Plus I think it is nice to know why a once active user is taking a break, even if they don't go into detail. -- Bunai82 ^(talk) 00:50, May 5, 2012 (UTC)

Whenever I do that I set up an afk template, I currently use one here, lol. ƒelinoel (Talk) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Wikia_Logo.svg/45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 00:53, May 5, 2012 (UTC)

Pretty sweet set up. -- Bunai82 ^(talk) 14:55, May 7, 2012 (UTC)

Yea I first made it when I was at the Avatar wiki but then I brought it over to that wiki. ƒelinoel (Talk) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Wikia_Logo.svg/45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 13:13, May 8, 2012 (UTC)

Wha

Why aren't Toadgamer and BladeGuy admins anymore?

A hero boy named Finn 23:46, May 23, 2012 (UTC)

• Toadgamer talk
• Bladeguy talk

-- Bunai82 ^(talk) 00:33, May 24, 2012 (UTC)

My activeness

I will be on and off the wiki as the year ends. I am currently in need of RAM and later a new computer.

I can do some maintenance but my sluggish computer and the noise it makes isn't pleasant. So it has been off and on for quite some time. I am mainly using my tablet for reading. -- Bunai82 ^(talk) 04:46, August 23, 2012 (UTC)

Rollbacks

Shouldn't rollbacks be included on this page? ♠M1870♠ 03:54, September 17, 2012 (UTC)

Not sure if this wiki considers rollblackers as being admins though instead of just minor moderators. Since rollbackers have never been included here. ƒelinoel (Talk) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Wikia_Logo.svg/45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 20:13, September 17, 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, we rollbackers are not considered a form of administration. It is more of a basic account with the ability to roll back edits from a string of vandalism, or a string of poor editing from a user. I don't see any reason why rollbackers need mentioning on the list. We are more of a backup to help with keeping the wiki free of stuff it doesn't need. In the end, we are just basic contributors to the wiki like everyone else. True Sephiroth 21:04, September 17, 2012 (UTC)

Still Rollbackers are users with rights, and seeing how all other forms of rights users are included on this page then why shouldn't Rollbacks be included? They should at least be considered since they are important to the community. ♠M1870♠ 02:40, September 18, 2012 (UTC)

Well, I'm not saying we are not important (btw, glad to see you back M1870.). I think the main reason why rollbackers are not listed would be to limit the amount, as well as quell the possibilities of people begging for the position of rollbacker. It is like how the MA section used to only show two seats instead of 3 to avoid people begging for that 3rd spot, and believe me there were people begging for it. True Sephiroth 03:22, September 18, 2012 (UTC)

Thanks :D And it wouldn't hurt to include you guys into the list. I mean even chat mods are on the list and I'm pretty sure more people would beg to me a mod then a rollback :3 Besides there are only 5 active rollbacks. 5 should be enough for the wiki since Admins can also rollback edits as well. ♠M1870♠ 03:31, September 19, 2012 (UTC)

No. I knew you'd come! I had a feeling ^Talk 17:43, September 19, 2012 (UTC)

Over at the Warehouse 13 Wikia we list off our Rollbackers on the admin list. ƒelinoel (Talk) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Wikia_Logo.svg/45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 20:07, September 24, 2012 (UTC)

Blocking

I have been blocked by Ty or something, and I don't see why. I also don't know how to contact him or reason. I have unintentionally uttered a few swear words, but apologised each time, and never spammed. I treat users with respect, and I don't tease, bully, spam, or create multiple accounts. I also never spam edit, as I've done one edit on the princess bubblegum page for overall improvement. What do I do at this point? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iglyboop (talk • contribs)

Please remember to sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~). ƒelinoel (Talk) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Wikia_Logo.svg/45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 22:58, December 11, 2012 (UTC)

Chat mods

Sooo are there any requirements to become a chat mod? Are they not set in stone, or can admins just promote them for good work in chat? Just curious. And is there a maximum number of seats for them? It seems like it changes every time I visit this page.
Waddle D33 ^Talk _Contribs ಠ_ಠ 08:54, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

Other than the guidelines here... I've noticed that current chat mods will grant the chat mod ability to anyone and randomly. ƒelinoel (Talk) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Wikia_Logo.svg/45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 15:34, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

Rollback

Shouldn't people with rollback powers be listed as well?

The Wrath of Kronos 17:27, February 25, 2013 (UTC)

Someone opposed that, I forget who... maybe Tav? Yeah maybe it was Tav... ƒelinoel (Talk) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Wikia_Logo.svg/45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 18:47, February 25, 2013 (UTC)

Adminship requests

Since nearly everyone agrees that there are enough admins, can we include something along the lines of "please do not ask for administrator powers at this time" or the like? Please don't misunderstand me, as I know that there are many capable users who can be extremely helpful with admin powers. We just do not need excessive admins at this time. If the wiki goes through major changes, such as many admins resigning or becoming inactive for extensive periods of time, or higher incidences of vandalism (the occasional blanking of a page and typing "SREBYVSVSQ3YUINBYTYN^%&#$%" does not count), then adminship requests could be open. Some possibilities include a "Request for Adminship page" (RfA), or users can post their messages on bureau talk pages, or the community can vote, etc. but that's just for a potential future. And I still don't get the spontaneous pro/demotion of chat mods so I won't bring that issue up.
Waddle D33 ^Talk _Contribs ಠ_ಠ 22:51, April 28, 2013 (UTC)

I agree. Users should know that currently this wiki doesn't need more admins. It should be posted on this page. We could create a template and post it on this page and on all the bureaucrats' talk pages.

Bureaucrats, admins and chat mods should be elected by the community, I believe.

-- Being boring is boring. 03:53, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, people keep asking for adminship even though we have more than enough admins, it's pretty troublesome at times.

AHBNF 11:12, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

Saber - inactive?

It's states on Saber's profile that he's inactive. However, it doesn't on this page. Shouldn't that be added on this page, too? Being boring is boring. 14:55, April 30, 2013 (UTC)

Possibly. ƒelinoel (Talk) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Wikia_Logo.svg/45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 15:00, April 30, 2013 (UTC)

OK. Thanks.-- Being boring is boring. 15:10, April 30, 2013 (UTC)

no --ViolentPeacefulCatloverr (talk) 12:48, June 30, 2013 (UTC)

This is a closed discussion.

And what do you propose, making people believe he's still active?

Being boring is boring. 13:38, June 30, 2013 (UTC)

get out vandal --ViolentPeacefulCatloverr (talk) 13:58, June 30, 2013 (UTC)

Look, just because you don't like him doesn't mean he's wrong.

• Bike (^B₁^K₃)
   
  • Talk
  • Contributions
  • Blog

14:05, June 30, 2013 (UTC)

Activity report - July 12th

Hello,
to anyone reading, I will be 'temporarily' inactive for about a week. 
I currently have the task of updating my primary wiki (Gaiapedia) and also doing maintenance on two other wikis (Fanloid and Vocaloid.Answers). 
I can be contacted on my talk page for anything you may need help with, 
however, I won't be around very long to do 'multiple' maintenance because that requires my full focus.

Thank you.

-- Bunai82 ^(talk) 19:09, July 12, 2013 (UTC)

A disturbing lack of Admins

So, it seems as of now we don't have any admins, should we leave it this way? :|

AHBNF 02:38, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

I'm up for the position. The 2nd Law 04:34, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

Any sign of good editors who deserve an adminship?

(P.S. The one who is mature enough I guess?)

BOGEYMAN 04:53, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

Pfft, we have 8 sysops. We have no need for regular admins (aka blue admins). Besides, I doubt anyone qualifies. 05:03, February 19, 2014 (UTC)—BellamyBug (talk|tribs)

Leave it this way, it seems better. I think we need more mods in the Asian timezone and OS is the only one currently.

I Dont Even 05:08, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

My tummy hurts. Oh pitiful shadow, Lost in darkness. 05:31, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

Better idea: ditch the MA's, and move all the current MA's up to the administrator spots. What's the point in having MA's if they do all the same as regular administrators? Quite frankly, the MA's have always done more than the regular administrators...and even the bureaucrats --•••• + DeviantSerpent 06:22, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

Agreed. ---^ Accept for Feli. Sorry, but he's done alot. :p Oh pitiful shadow, Lost in darkness. 08:21, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

I agree with DS. The 2nd Law 14:55, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

No, we need admins again. This wiki community is WAY too large to go on without them. It may seem that we have gotten through so far without them, but believe me, this Pax Wikia (if you know Latin, you'll get what I mean), won't last that long. It may take months, but, trouble will brew if there are no admins here. Adventuretimegurl123 00:55, February 20, 2014 (UTC))

It seems we can't reach a compromise. What a shocker.

AHBNF 00:56, February 20, 2014 (UTC)

i was thinking about coming back, i admit, but now its not that i do not wish to. just recently i developed issues with my wrist and now i have to lay off the typing for awhile. i am typing with one hand so everything is in lowercase. i might come back, but not until i recover fully. this is not a joke either, i just thought you guys should know the truth. Heeeeeeeeeeeere's JOHNNY !!!

01:09, February 20, 2014 (UTC)

Alright, if that's the case, I think we should promote at least one new admin, I think VOO would be a good candidate.

AHBNF 12:09, February 20, 2014 (UTC)

VOO? The guy who was demoted and banned 1,000,000,000,000 times?

Okay... well, on a related note, ATG, why are you complaining that the wiki cannot go on without admins when there are several bureaucrats at the moment? Any of these said bureaucrats could easily promote more admins... that being said, the MA's are admins for flap flapping sake.

Let's look at it this way - what are the MA's authorized to do? Well, they can block users, delete pages, protect pages, run their own bots. What makes their position any different than ordinary administrators? What is the point in having maintenance administrators if all administrators serve the same purpose of wiki maintenance? --•••• + DeviantSerpent 12:43, February 20, 2014 (UTC)

Apparently a certain user who has been demoted and banned 1,000,000,000,000 times with a history of swearing, backtalking to mods, racial harassment, and death threats is now an admin. Someone please tell me I'm wrong. —BellamyBug (talk|tribs) 03:03, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

 FYI, the "racial harassment and death threats" thing was sorted out earlier this month. But EASILY can I tell that this promotion is taking us all to hell. The 2nd Law 03:16, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

I can defend myself against all of these mentioned accusations.

Princess Luna 03:20, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

VKO was a fairly good admin despite getting demoted, lets just see how it plays out guys. If he screws up he can easily be demoted, he was a fairly good admin for the most part of it guys. In due time, we'll know if he's fit. He was obviously promoted for a fairly nice reason. Oh pitiful shadow, Lost in darkness. 03:23, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

Aye. I've got one chance to screw up. The first time I do is a demotion.

Princess Luna 03:25, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

See? I'm sure Hero boy and FPF will keep a close eye on him as well, don't sweat it guys! Oh pitiful shadow, Lost in darkness. 03:27, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

I hope you guys realize you're promoting someone who has not made a single mainspace edit since he came back with this account--please tell me how this helps with the potential vandal problems, or how he even qualifies in the first place.

If anyone is to be made admin, I would want it to be someone who shows they can keep an eye on reverting edits. The entire situation with VKO and SD was sorted out, and I apologize for making that mistake--but VKO already had a history of that sort of behaviour before that even happened. Hence his ban log.

I honestly do not trust VKO enough to hold any sort of rights, let alone admin rights. Whether you guys do or not is to be your own take - but I would like if you guys could look at the possible outcome of this before making such a decision. --•••• + DeviantSerpent 03:56, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

On second thought, he's already been promoted... wow, it seems consensus means nothing in this generation. --•••• + DeviantSerpent 03:59, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

Better yet, no reason was given as to why he was promoted^[1]. —BellamyBug (talk|tribs) 04:01, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

If you think we have no admins, see here, we have like eight admins, eight more if you count chat moderators (I kinda don't since the chat is kinda separate from the wiki). I do not understand all of this talk of having no admins when we very clearly have at the very least eight when eight is quite a few for one wiki.

As for VKO... who promoted him? ƒelinoel (Talk) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Wikia_Logo.svg/45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 04:02, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

I've discussed this with a good few people already. DS, as for what you have against me, it is understandable, but I can't say more than I have that I am a different person than I was. As for mainspace edits, I have them. Please look at my edit history. If you would like to discuss this with me, I'd be glad to give you my Skype name or something of the sort, but I doubt this is the best place to do so.

Princess Luna 04:05, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

Have you discussed this with Tavis? Because I just did and his response was, "Isn't he banned?"

Ah it seems Hero promoted him. lol and thanks Finn Murtons. ƒelinoel (Talk) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Wikia_Logo.svg/45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 04:12, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

Why would I be banned? I have done nothing wrong.

Princess Luna 04:18, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

Woah wait... Wikia the company banned you?! I thought they only did that for people who phish or are too young... ƒelinoel (Talk) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Wikia_Logo.svg/45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 04:20, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

Wikia banned me? I was never aware of this. Unless it was when I first created this account and there was a huge misunderstanding. This account was believed to be a sockpuppet to avoid a ban, which it wasn't, so maybe that's what it was.

Princess Luna 04:22, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

Yeah man, I apperciate the work you do around here. But I wish you were in chat more. I sorta wish we could talk more, and I remember when you used to be in chat(I think) But we never really spoke there either. And I'm just giving my opinion on how this should be handled. I say we just let it play out, give VKO one chance. Oh pitiful shadow, Lost in darkness. 04:22, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

My only existing argument here is that VKO was promoted without any sign of a clear consensus. Two people does not make a consensus--apparently the bureaucrats here feel it's up to them to decide who gets promoted and to just ignore everyone elses points altogether.

The points I put out are always either ignored or pushed aside obviously because I have less power and thus my opinions don't matter. If they would matter then Hero Boy would've taken out a few minutes to address the concerns rather than rashly promoting VKO just because one user agreed with him. --•••• + DeviantSerpent 04:27, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

VKO as a Wikia Star I kinda feel like I can't not speak to someone at Wikia about you here... I don't want to lose my position...

lol Murtons at my old job I did sometimes get on Chat and I mostly spoke to people who messaged me. Other than that I get on chat when I need to speak with someone, sorry. One of my profiles here does have other methods to contact me though.

No Dev your points are noticed and I agree, I have to ask though besides Hero who was the second person? Also though I agree there is no real way to maintain such a system that you would wish to implement and so things like new admins are usually handled by the crats really... and... they are generally based on intelligence and previous edits... ƒelinoel (Talk) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Wikia_Logo.svg/45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 04:31, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

That's weird, my last post didn't show up. But as it stands, I have talked to Sparda, Hero Boy, and FPF, and they all say that If I wish to keep this spot, I will have to prove myself worthy of it. It's what I do now that matters, not what I have done. And Feli, by all means go tell someone from Wikia. I don't care. I just wish people could understand what IIII am saying for once and listen to ME and what I have to say. It's slightly frustrating.

Princess Luna 04:34, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

feli*

I am not telling, I am asking. ƒelinoel (Talk) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Wikia_Logo.svg/45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 04:40, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, don't tell wiki. Don't let us down, VKO! =] Anyway, everyone should know we have everything under control. We have 8 active and capable admins. Crats = very goo admin, so don't worry about it. We'll make it through this, together! --Tavisource 04:41, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

That's funny Feli, mind linking me? (Can't seem to find it. :/) And I'm sure we talked once or twice. Hey Tavis! Good to see you on, I feel like it'd be nice to talk to you as well. Hope to see you on here even more though! We've never actually talked. o: Oh pitiful shadow, Lost in darkness. 04:43, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

Tavis, I wouldn't think of it again. The Army changed me tremendously, believe it or not, and I understand now what responsibility is. You've got my word as a soldier. Also, it is great to hear from you again!

Princess Luna 04:45, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

okay, awesome. Yeah, Murtons, I've been quite busy. Finishing my last year of school and taking on 3 jobs at once. Barely getting a few hours of sleep every night.--Tavisource 04:47, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

and Maint Admins = admins who do a TON of work cleaning that no one else seems to want to do.

COME ON PEOPLE I am getting SO MANY edit conflicts

@Murtons, I have many profiles, they generate randomly, this is my original one with my contact info. ƒelinoel (Talk) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Wikia_Logo.svg/45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 04:48, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

I do agree with you there, feli, lots of these edit conflicts, lol.

Princess Luna 04:52, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

For the record, I prefer felinoel as opposed to Felinoel because my name is ƒelinoel and it is easier to type f than ƒ. ƒelinoel (Talk) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Wikia_Logo.svg/45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 04:55, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

Ah, sorry to hear man! Didn't mean to bring your personal life into this! I hope it gets easier for you, sounds rough, but maybe sometime soon right? Good luck with school! Oh pitiful shadow, Lost in darkness. 04:56, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

@feli Okay. I apologize for that. I'm just used to capitalizing names, so I did that. I think you've told me before, actually. and Tavis, hope things get better for you man! Hooah!

Princess Luna 04:57, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

hopefully. It's all good. =]--Tavisource 04:59, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

Good to hear! Nice to see you on every now and then as well. c: Oh pitiful shadow, Lost in darkness. 05:01, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

PLEASE NO EDIT CONFLICT THIS TI--good. Anyways, is this, like, our chatting board or something since chat is currently offline or whatnot? Cause right now we're drifting this whole discussion immensely off-topic. --•••• + DeviantSerpent 05:03, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

FREAL those edit conflicts... Oh lawt. Anyone wanna make a blog or something?

Princess Luna 05:04, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

No, enough blogs on this subject have been made. ƒelinoel (Talk) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Wikia_Logo.svg/45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 05:06, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

I made a blog that will kill time. --•••• + DeviantSerpent 05:08, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

Oh yeah, sorry DS. xD Got us a bit off topic. Just glad to see Tavis and Feli on account of never really talking to them much. :p But yeah, I'll move the off topic things to the blog sorry. Oh pitiful shadow, Lost in darkness. 05:16, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

feli*

For those who notice the change, due to a lack of need, the Maintenance Admin position was removed. ƒelinoel (Talk) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Wikia_Logo.svg/45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 05:19, February 21, 2014 (UTC)

Making VKO admin again was a huge mistake, Hero.... Adventuretimegurl123 00:28, February 22, 2014 (UTC))

That's certainly an opinion.

Princess Luna 00:32, February 22, 2014 (UTC)

An opnion?! To quote Bellemybug: "demoted and banned 1,000,000,000,000 times with a history of swearing, backtalking to mods, racial harassment, and death threats is now an admin." And I remember when you were demoted. You have no right being an admin with such a history as yours, even if you say you've "changed". Adventuretimegurl123 00:39, February 22, 2014 (UTC))

If you'd take the time to notice and do a bit of research, you'd see that those accusations were already disproven.

Princess Luna 00:41, February 22, 2014 (UTC)

Some people never learn. But in this case, let's just see how it goes shall we? BOGEYMAN 00:45, February 22, 2014 (UTC)

Guys, I'm really tired of arguing about this. It's getting old, and honestly, it's pointless. If you don't believe me, great, but I'm done arguing.

Princess Luna 00:48, February 22, 2014 (UTC)

I'm also tired watching you get promoted and demoted for a thousand times =p

No offense

BOGEYMAN 00:51, February 22, 2014 (UTC)

Well then don't watch. I don't see how you can say no offense either, when clearly some offense is meant.

Princess Luna 00:52, February 22, 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, sarcasm doesn't work well on the internet

BOGEYMAN 00:54, February 22, 2014 (UTC)

Oh hello it seems somebody does not matter anymore and is ignored. Heeeeeeeeeeeere's JOHNNY !!!

00:58, February 22, 2014 (UTC)

How to kill a thread. Heeeeeeeeeeeere's JOHNNY !!!

01:21, February 22, 2014 (UTC)

Seeing as how it is a thread that served no purpose and held no merit, it is fine Flam. ƒelinoel (Talk) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Wikia_Logo.svg/45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 05:36, February 22, 2014 (UTC)

Specific Admin Responsibilities

Does each admin look after specific areas of administration? i.e. Is there a specific admin we should report vandals to and another for handling corrupted page data, etc.? If so, could this please be posted somewhere more obvious (like a link on the main page) because I don't see it listed anywhere. KADC "Be unreasonable." (talk) 18:53, March 30, 2014 (UTC)

No, all admins take all responsibilities when possible. You just report to any of the admins, preferably one that is either online more or currently online if possible. All admins are equal and we don't divide jobs. City♥Lightshttp://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Wikia_Logo.svg/45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 19:31, March 30, 2014 (UTC)

True, we used to have lesser ranked admins that dealt with cleaning articles and managing our media files called Maintenance Admins, but it is just easier to have regular admins. ƒelinoel (Talk) http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/17/Wikia_Logo.svg/45px-Wikia_Logo.svg.png 09:09, April 10, 2014 (UTC)