while*

I got sad when PB grows old again and though I liked the ending I want to hear more things related to the comet, the stakes ending I didn't liked that much but this is all my personal opinion also I would like to add that I myself liked the Finn loses his arm very much, it only happens to me that seems short when I count the episodes instead of seeing them

"it's hard for me to take you seriously when you only give three examples one of which was in season 3, and consider this a valid statement with outdated evidence."

You just contradicted yourself with your three examples... (That's not part of my argument, it's just me being a butt. Also, I know your reference was from season 2, but I can't really change a quote)

Anyways, I am not contradicting myself for liking some episode's handlings over others. I do like the season six premiere. I do not like the episode Breezy because it was unentertaining and the way he got his arm back didn't connect with me. I did not care if he got a robotic arm, that isn't why I dislike it. You seem to have the impression that I don't like the handling of Adventure Time's story conlusions. The only reason I tried to bring this up was because I had just seen a couple of videos making reference, and I wanted to see what other people thought, while putting in my opinion. Instead of just trying to have a complete deconstruction of my thesis, you could have merely said: "I don't see it that way, they should continue writing the way they do." That simple. Backtracking, I personally found the Stakes miniseries to be underwhelming, in some cases predictable, and ultimately not worth its hype. The miniseries only episode that actually got my attention emotionally was the final one, but even then, Stakes wasn't a very fun adventure overall. I found myself looking forward to the PB and KOO parts a lot more. So, it's obvious that we both have strong opinions on this matter. I say we leave it at this, and conclude the discussion.

I didn't contradict myself, and that quote from me is taken out of context to support your argument, which is also a logical fallacy. I had told you I didn't take you seriously because you said, or rather implied every story in Adventure Time is underwhelming and lacks intensity, but can only provide an insufficient amount of examples as there are more than three. The reason I didn't commit hypocracy is because I didn't generalize every story in Adventure Time as being intriguing. You may not have contradicted yourself, but it is inconsistent. Notice how you are no longer defending your thesis? Now you are expecting me to contradict something unrelated. Stop that. I really don't mind that you find some stories less enjoyable than others, what I am challenging is your reasons for this. I am challenging AT always having storylines that lack intensity, which is wrong because that generalization ignores exceptions. I took on the impression you disliked how Adventure Time handles conclusions because you are literally defending the criticism. You don't favor the criticisms you have, they are criticisms. You made that thesis, I disagree with it, I explain why. That's all that needs to happen, I don't require anyone to tell me how to speak to others. As far as the critiques you've seen, give credit. Otherwise, how am I supposed to know that the words you say aren't parroted? No wonder I would assume this critique is yours, you never gave credit that your thesis was made by someone else. You mentioned you've seen some other videos online but said that you share the same critique, you didn't tell me your critique was based off these reviews or people in general that share the same opinion. About the Stakes miniseries, how so? Why do you feel this way?

I disagree that your quote was used out of context merely for the sake of my argument, but they were your words, so I'll let you have that one. And I feel this has moved on from my thesis, and is now more about straight up opinion. Yes, there are exceptions to what I said, but out of six seasons, there are bound to be exceptions. Everyone would be agreeing with me if there weren't, and THAT was the point of my thesis. Do the episodes that have a more melancholy or anticlimactic ending wear you out? Do you even think there is an abundance of them? How do you percieve the episodes I accuse of this? That was the point of this: to see what other people have noticed. You didn't really start off with what you noticed, and instead went straight for my "argument" that I intended to merely be a statement of opinion to provoke interest, not the topic someone's response. As for Stakes, I felt that I didn't laugh at the comical moments, and felt that they were mostly weak. Episode 1 had a nice feel as an introduction. I felt that the second episode that flashed back was just a summed up version of Marcy's Super Secret Scrapbook. That would be fine if they captured the book well. And even if they didn't want that, if they wanted to do their own thing, which is also fine, then they should have made it a better viewing experienced. Even for its natural 11 minute quick runtime, everything felt rushed with no sense of emotion in there, which we both know Adventure Time can successfully do. The third part I have trouble remembering, so I'm not sure how I feel about it. Episode 4 was fine, I suppose. It didn't stand out to me as a great episode or chapter to Stakes, but it had the most comical moments out of the 8 episodes. The next two episodes were disappointments to me because I didn't like the vampires. The Heirophant was the better of the two, but they wasted the potential to make him an interesting character, and I had guessed from previous episodes that he would die from using the old ways he overly promoted, and it's easy to guess what will happen when you're watching the episode. The Moon just seemed so lame as the "sweet, small looking one who really has a deep voice and is hard to stop" villain. It was the weakest of all of the episodes. The next episode didn't make me upset with much, it was just (sorry to use this word a lot today) underwhelming. It didn't upset me all that much, as it was a lot more enjoyable than the last two more action-packed episodes. Then, the final episode: The Dark Cloud. Everyone knew Marceline was going to become a vampire again, that's fine. But the action didn't seem very action-y, and the coupla jokes made weren't funny. I DID however enjoy Marceline talking to the Vampire King in this episode, as those scenes were thought-provoking. But, this could have easily been a condensed half-hour special. Or at the most, 4 episodes. It felt drawn out when all that was needed was this conclusion. So after all of that, the ending can't be enjoyed (by me) to the same capacity it would be if it felt like a better "complete story" and not a "how can we fill out the next 8 episodes" set up. The episodic nature is fine with things like this, and I was excited for it in an aspect. But the pieces didn't flow, I feel, much at all. They didn't even entertain enough for me to excuse the lack of flow. Finally, I'm sure you've noticed I've skipped over something, and it is my favorite part (but obviously you wouldn't know that, lol) of Stakes: the song! The song was a GREAT closer to it. It summed up the tone the episodes tried to connect with here and there, even though only the first and last parts were successful. But where did the song come from? Why, it came from Marceline's mom in episode 2, who was shown because............... Fan service? To show that Marceline did at one point know her mom? I'm not sure, so what could have emotionally grasped me left me completely confused. Why was Marceline's mom integral to her vampire story? She became a vampire sometime after Simon and Marcy, so shouldn't that time be instead spent showing a bit more of Simon? If you have a good reason for her mom being there, I promise I will gladly change my mind.

Video Sources: Pizza Party Podcast, where they discuss Breezy, and Channel Awesome's Adventure Time vlogs, specifically the Finn The Human and Jake the Dog ones. Any other sources I'll have to specifically locate on forums.

I'm not really given anything to counter that's all just your personal opinion which is fine to have, but at least put forth effort into saying why you believe the things that you do. I'm not going to ask you to critically think, as you gave me a summary not an analysis, but mostly was opinionated. I enjoyed Stakes, primarily because I love Marceline, and learning more about her was very intriguing. I enjoyed seeing her go through the obstacles she faced.

Wow. The masters of arguments have spoken.

I have an irrelevant question has anybody Associated reboot with dr. Monroe?

Just curios.Btw you both are the masters of arguments.No disputing that. Thats already been settled.