User talk:Yuzura

Welcome
Hi Yuzura, welcome to the ! You're receiving this automated message because you made your first contribution to this wiki. Someone will probably see your edit to the Seedwad page shortly.

Please take a look at our rules and manual of style to learn about how to correctly create and edit pages on our wiki.

Leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Blugo34 (Talk) 14:35, February 2, 2013

Tavisource
Maybe in a while. We're always in need of MA's. But we just got a new MA.  Don't worry, I'm sure it's not going to be long until we need you as MA.-- Tavis  ource  18:34, March 16, 2013 (UTC)

Message to mods: Evidence
Sparda speaking. This is a friendly reminder to all mods that you should always take screenshots when you ban someone from the chat and upload them to the wiki. These screenshots should show evidence of valid reasoning for banning the person so it may be shown if ever need be. This message also applies to all admins performing chat moderator duties. Thank you for your hard work. Have a nice day. --  Lost  Chocobo   Knight   06:17, March 24, 2013 (UTC)

AppleMath
Hi Yuzura.

Respect to your enthusiastic wiki edit,

I think the episode connection of "All the Little People", which says
 * The hole that Magic Man comes out of highly resembles the hole that Ice King and company used to exit the mystery dungeon. This could imply that Magic Man used the Ancient Sleeping Magi of Life Giving to bring the little people to life.

doesn't it so speculative?

I suggest that should be deleted...


 * First of all, sign your posts with ~ . Second, I have never even edited that page. But to answer your question, yes, that information strongly resembles a speculation. -- Yuzura  (talk)  18:10, March 25, 2013 (UTC)

Revert without Edit Summary
You've reverted my edit on Simon and Marcy with no explanation, while my edit made use of the edit summary. I've noticed that you've done this before to others in the article history. Could you explain why you think it is necessary to have the same trivia point included twice, a misspelled character name, and a link to a version of the series that they are not in (the television show)? ChozoBoy (Talk/Contribs) 00:35, March 28, 2013 (UTC)


 * Majority of your edit was vandalism. You were correct about it being the video game, but you vandalized the bullets. I do not leave summaries for self-explanatory reasons. I rollback these edits as a faster form of reverting edits. Aside from that, the name being misspelled, I did not notice that correction, so I apologize. -- Yuzura  (talk)  00:42, March 28, 2013 (UTC)


 * An accidental line break is not vandalism. ChozoBoy (Talk/Contribs) 01:48, March 28, 2013 (UTC)


 * You removed an entire bullet, which was relevant. That is considered vandalism. -- Yuzura  (talk)  01:49, March 28, 2013 (UTC)


 * As stated in my edit summary that you grazed over when you reverted my edit (I do not believe that you had performed a rollback), it was a near duplicate of the previous bullet. Name typo and all. Returning to the subject of rollback, you do not seem to have rollback status, from what I can discern. If you did, you might know the wiki's rules pertaining to them. Here they are, should you ever decide to apply:


 * Any user can revert a page using the "Undo" option in the page history. Use the edit summary to explain why the edit is being undone.
 * Administrators and users with rollback status can also revert the edits of one user and restore the page to the last version by the previous author.
 * Click rollback on the page history, the user contribution list, or on the diff page.
 * Reversions are given the automatic edit summary Reverted edits by X to last version by Y.
 * Because rollbacks skip the step of adding a custom edit summary, they should be used for obvious vandalism only.
 * ChozoBoy (Talk/Contribs) 13:02, March 29, 2013 (UTC)


 * First of all, I know all about rollbacking edits. Secondly, I am certain I rollbacked the edit. And no, the two varied and therefore deserve their own respective bullets of trivia. I reverted it with rollback because, like I said, the reason was self-explanatory. -- Yuzura  (talk)  13:11, March 29, 2013 (UTC)

Excuse me
Why would you block a users bot that could be helpful to the wiki? -- Bunai82 (talk) 13:01, March 28, 2013 (UTC)


 * I have reasoning for doing so. It belonged to Blugo, whom had sockpuppeted so excessively. His bot was no longer making bot edits, as I observed, and all of the edits were made by Blugo himself. The edits were not automated and were considered sockpuppeting in a way. Yes, it could be helpful, such as my bot, but he refuses to edit on only one account. The man-made edits were repeated. Essentially, I blocked it for containing sock edits from Blugo, and not automated edits. -- Yuzura  (talk)  13:08, March 28, 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm not exactly blocked. And those sockpuppets accounts don't belong to mine, as for the recent discussion with Sparda, please consult him about that. Also, you blocked my bot account without even my consent. It's still in use, I'm not finished with correcting grammar in this wiki, even I'm not an admin. I also used my Bot account when I wasn't blocked. Didn't you notice? So before you abruptly ban someone, please, consult the owner first before doing anything stupid. Have a good day. -- I'd like your feedback as to whether I was    brilliant or simply outstanding.  14:06, March 28, 2013 (UTC)


 * When you weren't blocked- before the suspected sockpuppetry. I will converse with Sparda about this. I blocked the bot account for you were manually editing on it, as if it was a sock. I will unban the account and get it reflagged immediately. However, I was instructed by Hero Boy to block it, per PM in chat. -- Yuzura  (talk)  14:11, March 28, 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks for replying. I will have to agree with the above statement, it would have been best to contact the User with the bot before banning.
 * If the user was previously an admin and is actually still helpful to the wiki, then suddenly banning them without talking just looks bad. I was confused, and while it isn't necessary to reveal a private matter (if it is) at least give a heads up would clear some thing. -- Bunai82 (talk) 00:28, March 29, 2013 (UTC)

Block Request
Requesting a block for Special:Contributions/92.98.214.158. -P  16:54, March 29, 2013 (UTC)


 * Blocked. Thanks for the report. Sorry it took me so long to respond to this. -- Yuzura  (talk)  18:02, March 29, 2013 (UTC)

Deleted post
Yuzura I edited Simon And Marcy but my post got deleted.

Kazuluka

Re: Delete template
What if it is a page to be deleted on sight? 02:21, March 30, 2013 (UTC)


 * Do not ask me. Sparda told me to notify you about that. -- Yuzura  (talk)  02:23, March 30, 2013 (UTC)