Category talk:Candidates for deletion

'Please use this page to discuss pages that have been labelled for deletion. '

'When posting your thoughts on an article getting deleted or not, please precede your post with'' *, *, or *. To remove your vote, use the unvoting template like this:. To make a neutral statement put. To make a comment put .''' Voting ends for a discussion once four days has passed and no one has voted (except during ties)'''. Unless five days pass and the vote is unanimous, then the vote ends.'''

Archive - 01 02 03 04 05

Mirror Finns
This should be in the Finn article, in the "disguises and alternate forms" section. Party Kat (talk) 00:04, April 12, 2013 (UTC)

TheMostBoringManInTheWorld (talk) 12:47, April 12, 2013 (UTC)

The Disguises/Alternate forms section is for the disguises and alternate forms of the singular entity named Finn. The mirror Finns are entities separate from this entity, just like Farmworld Finn. 20:16, April 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * Alternate forms can stand for alternate Finn of an alternate universe. You see, separate entities that represent Finn in another dimension are alternate forms (alternate forms, alternate universes--get it?). That's why I propose to merge the Mirror Finns with Finn's page (also Farmworld Finn, but that's another discussion. 180px-Chrell btts.PNG Being boring is boring.  250px-2423266537 bb6495420e o.PNG 11:04, April 23, 2013 (UTC)


 * I excuse myself, my good man. I have just noticed that it has been decided to keep the Farmworld character articles the way they are. Since the the Mirror Finns are similar, they should be kept the way they are. 180px-Chrell btts.PNG Being boring is boring.  250px-2423266537 bb6495420e o.PNG 12:14, April 26, 2013 (UTC)

MIRROR FINNS - THIS DISCUSSION WAS NEVER SETTLED -- Bunai82 (talk) 22:48, June 16, 2014 (UTC) - PLEASE CONTINUE TO VOTE AND DISCUSS BELOW THIS LINE


 * User:Animaltamer7Animaltamer7 (talk) 10:49, June 24, 2014 (UTC)

Bat

 * This character was named and therefore is good enough by our Wiki's standards to be in an article, mention this character in a Species article but do not delete. 17:31, July 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * I like this idea. TheMostBoringManInTheWorld   (talk)  02:05, July 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * YUSH YUSH ~ BH : The  Seductive  Bra ~ 04:08, August 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok then if everyone seems to agree (and since it meets the wiki's standards for whether or not it can have an article), what species article do we merge it to? It isn't a rodent. 15:32, August 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure. Maybe flying creatures? TheMostBoringManInTheWorld   (talk)  05:31, August 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * That isn't really a species... 14:39, August 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, there are the Bat Bugs... TheMostBoringManInTheWorld   (talk)  10:57, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * That is more of a group character page than an actual species. 14:18, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * It would still make sense to merge it with the bat article. TheMostBoringManInTheWorld   (talk)  02:38, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * I disagree but that is neither here nor there. 19:49, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * Maybe on that species page  you were working on. By, the way, do I have the permission to edit it? I noticed some things and which I would like to fix.
 * lol no like two years ago I made that article and took the arduous task of merging all creatures into individual species, but then Cornprone stepped in and commented his not liking such a thing so I moved it to my userspace in lieu of deleting it. tbh Corn was right, anyways our current species page is just the species category. 13:26, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Kay den. TheMostBoringManInTheWorld   (talk)  14:06, Octomber 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * I say we make a page for all the animals that attend Finn and Jake's cave party and don't appear in a later episode: Party Worm, Amoeba, Centipede, Jellyfish, and Bat. We can call it "Party Animals" or something. We'd only lose 2 pages. Bellamybug (talk) 04:25, September 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * idk... we usually merge pages based on species... 13:49, September 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, here's a mock-up if anyone wants to take a look at it --Bellamybug (talk) 22:01, October 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * I like how you used the user template instead of the species template. 13:24, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * The only other instance of that happening, which I was and still am against, uses the character template. Forest_inhabitant 20:27, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * There's also Castle Staff. I was actually planning on using the character template for this as well (since they're not one distinct species). I think it's preferable to having a bunch of stubby articles for each character. --Bellamybug (talk) 20:59, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * That is weird, they are on the Candy People article, why do they get this article too? 12:58, October 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * That seems fine to me. TheMostBoringManInTheWorld   (talk)  14:06, October 6, 2013 (UTC)

BAT - THIS DISCUSSION WAS NEVER SETTLED -- Bunai82 (talk) 22:48, June 16, 2014 (UTC) - PLEASE CONTINUE TO VOTE AND DISCUSS BELOW THIS LINE


 * Agreed User:Animaltamer709:03, July 19, 2014 (UTC)

Junktown

 * I propose that we should merge this with the farmworld article Pongox (talk) 21:42, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * There are articles of small areas that have only appeared once or twice that we still keep. Veggie Village is but one example. Why not let this be its own article, too? - Alchemical (talk) 02:10, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * TheMostBoringManInTheWorld  (talk)  10:55, August 29, 2013 (UTC)

JUNKTOWN - THIS DISCUSSION WAS NEVER SETTLED -- Bunai82 (talk) 22:48, June 16, 2014 (UTC) - PLEASE CONTINUE TO VOTE AND DISCUSS BELOW THIS LINE


 * keep it as a seperate article. User:Animaltamer709:04, July 19, 2014 (UTC)

Lunchbox Princess

 * She is mentioned once in the fifth comic and has little to no information about her besides she is one of the princesses saved by Adventure Tim. BillStef (talk) 01:59, August 22, 2013 (UTC)


 * I say let it stay. There are quite a few articles that are almost as small as this one. Keeping the article doesn't hurt anything, either. - Alchemical (talk) 02:07, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * Of course it doesn't, but there is only two sentences and no image. Useless to have the page around. BillStef (talk) 02:11, August 22, 2013 (UTC)


 * Could you please remember to use the comment template by typing  when not typing out your opinion on voting page?  TheMostBoringManInTheWorld   (talk)  10:55, August 29, 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge all the character pages from Adventure Tim's universe? TheMostBoringManInTheWorld   (talk)  10:55, August 29, 2013 (UTC)


 * If she is only mentioned and there's no other information about her, then delete.

Waddle D33 Talk Contribs ಠ_ಠ  20:57, September 19, 2013 (UTC)


 * NOO I LOVE ALL PRINCESSES AND I REALLY HOPE I CAN SEE HER SOON!! NO DELETE!!!  13:40, September 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Please use the,   and   when voting.  TheMostBoringManInTheWorld   (talk)  15:52, October 6, 2013 (UTC)


 * Useless page —BellamyBug (talk|tribs) 20:09, April 23, 2014 (UTC)

LUNCHBOX PRINCESS - THIS DISCUSSION WAS NEVER SETTLED -- Bunai82 (talk) 22:48, June 16, 2014 (UTC) - PLEASE CONTINUE TO VOTE AND DISCUSS BELOW THIS LINE


 * Unless she gets a major/visual cameo in a later comic then delete. User:Animaltamer709:06, July 19, 2014 (UTC)

Bagel

 * It was on screen for very short time (under ten seconds). Doesn't really need a page about it. BillStef (talk) 18:00, August 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * Definitely get rid of it. A useless stub that is remotely useful. 18:03, August 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * It is not a stub and was a humorous item in the show, no real reason to delete. 18:49, August 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * I don't see why it is useless. It's relevant and has no real reason to be deleted. -- Yuzura☆ 炎のマスタ ー 19:02, August 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * How about we merge all the food related articles? TheMostBoringManInTheWorld   (talk)  10:50, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * Possibly... can you mock up a mockup? 14:19, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * It'd be smart.... 14:21, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * Let's do it. There's plenty of food articles: Animal-shaped chicken nuggets, Apple Pie, Crystal Gem Apple, Finn cake, Flakies, Honey energy drink, Perfect sandwich, Royal tart, Softy Cheese, Yeeargh! Bellamybug (talk) 15:07, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * If I can change my vote, then I'll change it to Merge. It seems pretty smart to merge all food articles. 17:06, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * I agree, that'd be a good idea. BillStef (talk) 03:00, August 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * We should make a page for the non-candy living food items, like PB's drink, the sandwich, and the raisin. PIZZA BAGELS!!!  [[File:Free marceline icon by picklecheesepie-d32mn6i-1-.gif]] 12:13, September 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * But this bagel isn't living? 13:50, September 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * He made an error? TheMostBoringManInTheWorld   (talk)  14:04, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * What? The bagel is living when we see it move. Some food items may be alive, others are not. I personally don't think it matters much, but I agree a lot of the food articles are short and unnecessary so maybe merging the minor foods, living or non, into one article would be the best bet. Heeeeeeeeeeeere's   JOHNNY   !!!  15:46, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * Wow I don't remember it moving... I am going to have to rewatch that episode. If it is alive then yes it is a character and not an object. 13:08, October 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * Aw yes, I remember now, the Witch brought the bagel to life... TheMostBoringManInTheWorld   (talk)  18:25, October 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah... silly me. 18:36, October 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * [[file:Nostalgia_Critic_-_Adventure_Time_Vlogs_Witch's_Garden|300px]]
 * 04:08, December 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Doug makes a really good point in that Vlog that it really should be considered a legit "character" in the show. Although it may be minor, it still falls into the humor of the show, so I agree with Feli. Heeeeeeeeeeeere's   JOHNNY   !!!  21:32, December 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * Merging the food articles doesn't sound like such a good idea to me anymore. Bellamybug (talk) 00:06, May 5, 2014 (UTC)

BAGEL - THIS DISCUSSION WAS NEVER SETTLED -- Bunai82 (talk) 22:48, June 16, 2014 (UTC) - PLEASE CONTINUE TO VOTE AND DISCUSS BELOW THIS LINE


 * I say we should keep it. User:Animaltamer709:27, July 19, 2014 (UTC)

Irregular Topography Expanse Princess

 * Similar to the Lunchbox Princess: lots of categories, lots of templates... little content, only mentioned briefly, very minor.

Waddle D33 Talk Contribs ಠ_ಠ  21:14, September 19, 2013 (UTC)


 * may be minor but still an AT character. --Bellamybug (talk) 01:35, September 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * - MINOR BUT STILL IMPORTANT! NO DELETE!! Yes, we are all aware that this is a minor page, but sooner or later she will be seen and we will just need to make a new page again! Keep her! Marceline150 (talk) 16:54, September 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * There wasn't any confirmation she would appear later on. Where did you get that from?
 * Bellamybug (talk) 22:16, September 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * Meets the requirements for an article. 13:51, September 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge all character pages from Adventure Tim's universe?
 * I dunno, that seems unnecessary to me? 17:48, October 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * The mentioned characters in the comic are too minor to have their own article, but they're still worth mentioning. A mock-up is the "only" solution.
 * idk about them being too minor to have an article... but a mock-up is a test page that illustrates how it would look? 13:40, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * idk about them being too minor to have an article... but a mock-up is a test page that illustrates how it would look? 13:40, October 24, 2013 (UTC)

ITE PRINCESS - THIS DISCUSSION WAS NEVER SETTLED -- Bunai82 (talk) 22:48, June 16, 2014 (UTC) - PLEASE CONTINUE TO VOTE AND DISCUSS BELOW THIS LINE


 * Like Lunchbox princess unless she gets a major/visual cameo in a later comic then delete. User:Animaltamer709:27, July 19, 2014 (UTC)

Cinnamon Roll

 * Another unseen comic book character mentioned in Issue 5. The article has two lines, and the character is very minor. --Bellamybug (talk) 00:11, September 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Meets the requirements for an article. 13:51, September 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * Maybe merge all the "Adventure Tim" world characters?
 * Agree with Bellamybug. Crystal Guardian.png Waddle D33  Talk Contribs ಠ_ಠ  22:25, October 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * Agree with Bellamybug. Crystal Guardian.png Waddle D33  Talk Contribs ಠ_ಠ  22:25, October 15, 2013 (UTC)

CINNAMON ROLL - THIS DISCUSSION WAS NEVER SETTLED -- Bunai82 (talk) 22:48, June 16, 2014 (UTC) - PLEASE CONTINUE TO VOTE AND DISCUSS BELOW THIS LINE


 * Agree with Feliniel. User:Animaltamer709:27, July 19, 2014 (UTC)

Green pants

 * Completely unnecessary.
 * May be, but then again, I could think of a lot of other uncecessary things. Anyway, the article is about the loot, and seems fitting. Perhaps you could merge all of the loot from the episode in a certain page? --Bellamybug (talk) 04:51, October 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * It is a) never named in the episode and b) does not affect the plot. I can't think of any other object articles that meet those two criteria. --Bellamybug (talk) 04:51, October 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * For reasons mentioned above. Useless article. Oil_Rope_Bombs  tlak pgae 09:40, October 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * This item has no real part in the plot of Dungeon Train. And there is not much that can be added to this page. That Magic Man (talk) 13:40, October 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * Or merge, since I see that this is favoring deletion... the article is written well enough and we don't really have any rules against obscure objects having articles here, I mean Jake thought they were important enough to put on over his spider silk pants or he was just doing the whole adventurer loots everything no matter what thing. Either way, there is no reason to delete this article imo. 11:59, October 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nothing to say here that hasn't already been said above. Crystal Guardian.png Waddle D33  Talk Contribs ಠ_ಠ  22:08, October 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge all clothes articles.
 * We have a lot of clothes articles, mostly they are merged to the owner, like Finn's sweaters and whatnot... I guess we could merge Jake's spider-woven pants with these pants but... why? 17:50, October 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Now that I remembered, there's also Finn's hat, which is a fine article.
 * and technically different since it is something iconic. 13:40, October 24, 2013 (UTC)

GREEN PANTS - THIS DISCUSSION WAS NEVER SETTLED -- Bunai82 (talk) 22:48, June 16, 2014 (UTC) - PLEASE CONTINUE TO VOTE AND DISCUSS BELOW THIS LINE


 * Agree with Feliniel. User:Animaltamer709:27, July 19, 2014 (UTC)

Cave

 * I'm guessing someone created this right after "In Your Footsteps" aired thinking it would play a bigger role in the future. Well, it's the future now, and the cave is still unimportant, so the page really shouldn't exist. --Bellamybug (talk) 05:18, October 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * Sure it played a small part and the article will likely forever be tiny, but it isn't like the location wasn't important, the Lich King was hiding there, that has to be of some importance anyways. 12:00, October 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * Both sides (Bellamybug and felinoel) have pretty strong arguments, so I can't tell for sure.

CAVE - THIS DISCUSSION WAS NEVER SETTLED -- Bunai82 (talk) 22:48, June 16, 2014 (UTC) - PLEASE CONTINUE TO VOTE AND DISCUSS BELOW THIS LINE


 * Agree with Feliniel. User:Animaltamer709:27, July 19, 2014 (UTC)

Princess Fiber
Waddle D33 Talk Contribs ಠ_ಠ  21:53, October 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * For the same reasons as Lunchbox Princess and Irregular Topography Expanse Princess.
 * Not even pictured but she IS a princess and I think we should keep record of the royalty. 14:28, October 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * BillStef (talk) 00:08, October 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Though I did help write the article, it's hard to justify its existence. --Bellamybug (talk) 02:05, October 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Create a main page about princesses and place her there.
 * Princess 18:04, October 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Then, that would reduce the work.
 * I guess that article could be restructured to the same style as a species article (but with the character infobox), maybe... 13:40, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * I guess that article could be restructured to the same style as a species article (but with the character infobox), maybe... 13:40, October 24, 2013 (UTC)

PRINCESS FIBER - THIS DISCUSSION WAS NEVER SETTLED -- Bunai82 (talk) 22:48, June 16, 2014 (UTC) - PLEASE CONTINUE TO VOTE AND DISCUSS BELOW THIS LINE


 * Agree with Feliniel. User:Animaltamer709:27, July 19, 2014 (UTC)

Royal Candy Vault

 * The Royal Vault and The Castle are two totally seperate locations, and this vault is a very important place in the episode Maze navigator 8 (talk) 16:01, November 2, 2013 (UTC)

<p style="background:red;">ROYAL CANDY VAULT - THIS DISCUSSION WAS NEVER SETTLED -- Bunai82 (talk) 22:48, June 16, 2014 (UTC) - PLEASE CONTINUE TO VOTE AND DISCUSS BELOW THIS LINE


 * Agree with Maze navigator. User:Animaltamer709:27, July 19, 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree. The vault is an important place in the episode,and is a seperate location. Nesssig.gif<font face="Arial" color="crimson" size=2>I'm <font face="Arial" color="#230081" size=2>A <font face="Arial" color="#CCD51E" size=2> PSIentist Mrsaturnsig.gif 16:43, July 30, 2014 (UTC)
 * It's unclear whether it's a separate location from the castle, but it is definitely a part of the Candy Kingdom. Merge it with the latter. Bellamybug (talk) 17:25, July 30, 2014 (UTC)

Guillermo

 * Let's get this over with. —BellamyBug (talk|tribs) 18:36, April 2, 2014 (UTC)
 * He was important to the episode! Keep him up and just fix the article. For one thing, the personality section is pitiful. We just need to make his page better.
 * "He" is actually an "it," and it doesn't meet the requirements for an article. —BellamyBug (talk|tribs) 01:09, April 24, 2014 (UTC)

Yellowpigprincess (talk) 00:44, April 24, 2014 (UTC)
 * I say keep, but change the page to where "he" is considered as an object. AVP3 (talk) 18:32, June 16, 2014 (UTC)

<p style="background:red;">GUILLERMO - THIS DISCUSSION WAS NEVER SETTLED -- Bunai82 (talk) 22:48, June 16, 2014 (UTC) - PLEASE CONTINUE TO VOTE AND DISCUSS BELOW THIS LINE


 * with Blargetha's article. This will also add more towards her page. -- Bunai82 (talk) 22:03, June 16, 2014 (UTC)


 * We should change it into an item page instead of a character page. User:Animaltamer709:27, July 19, 2014 (UTC)

Death Eels

 * Merge.png Merge with Snake. (Note: "Death Eels" is a noncanonical name. Their official name is "snake monsters," as seen in the storyboard.) Bellamybug (talk) 04:41, May 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * These characters play an extremely minor role and are just seen in the background in the episode they appear in. I do not believe they are important enough to have their own page.That Magic Man (talk) 23:26, May 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * We don't need to delete all the articles, we have a lot of spare room. If we would put it with that snake article we need to turn it into a species page and I will change my vote. 19:10, May 11, 2014 (UTC)

<p style="background:red;">DEATH EELS - THIS DISCUSSION WAS NEVER SETTLED -- Bunai82 (talk) 22:48, June 16, 2014 (UTC) - PLEASE CONTINUE TO VOTE AND DISCUSS BELOW THIS LINE


 * Too minor, and not significant to the episode. -- Crystal Guardian.png Waddle D33  <font color="midnightblue">Talk Contribs ಠ_ಠ  20:09, June 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * After looking at the snake page, I believe that a merge would be more suitable. -- Crystal Guardian.png Waddle D33  <font color="midnightblue">Talk Contribs ಠ_ಠ  20:13, June 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * -- Bunai82 (talk) 22:01, June 16, 2014 (UTC)


 * agreed with Felinoel. User:Animaltamer709:27, July 19, 2014 (UTC)
 * I personally love species pages, you get everything in one go. A "serpent" page would at least pull such things together and there have been more snakes around. -- Bunai82 (talk) 20:20, July 30, 2014 (UTC)

Kim Kil Whan's Daughter

 * It is not at all unlikely that this could be Kim Kil Whan's daughter, but this page is pure speculation. Not really sure why people are assuming he has a daughter because he has a picture frame in his house.That Magic Man (talk) 19:45, July 19, 2014 (UTC)
 * Agreed. We cannot jump to conclusions here. —Bellamybug (talk) 18:12, July 19, 2014 (UTC)
 * To early to to put up a page for it, plus there's no confirmation that she's his daughter. User:Animaltamer706:12, July 20, 2014 (UTC)
 * If there is a tweet about her name, can there be one about her relationship status? I'd much rather put ' His wife and daughter ' on his page. Besides being stubs, there isn't much to it.