Thread:I Love Luna/@comment-5327317-20140531030156/@comment-764088-20140531165942

Re-blocking for offenses? That, last time I checked, is against the policy, Unblocking myself? I was a 'crat and TOLD TAVIS I would reblock myself after I told him what I needed to tell him and he said not to, it'd be fine, I haven';t "trolled" in chat for months, I NEVER use "foul language"(show me a time I have and it MIGHT be valid), I have not "Called names" to a single person, I don't "threaten" anyone, and false criticism? I am asked what I mean by things, that isn't criticism at all, and hate? That makes absolutely no sense. How is me being blocked even reasonable? Was the community involved in this decision?

Alright, let me address and/or disprove every point you just brought up. First, we checked the rules and there was nothing against re-blocking for offenses ESPECIALLY since you were the one who unblocked yourself. And please don't use the "it's fine" thing as an excuse. You, yourself, know how silly it was of you to offer to block yourself again. If anyone was to block you again, it would be by a rightful admin. We took your case seriously and fairly discussed your case like you wished and this was the result. We never said you trolled in chat. All the posts you posted including comments and blogs included proof to your offenses. Not everything, according to the wikia rules, has to be via community consensus especially when it comes to blocking. The yuzu case and related cases (such as this) were out of the community's hands. They were corrupted and swayed by yuzu just as you admittedly were. Us admins stepped up in effort to "normalize" things and we've indeed gotten the support from the community for that. In the future, there might be a possibly we might do community votes for blocks (although that's quite unreasonable), but the current rules still stand as long as new rules have not been established. Please spend some time reading the rules while you're on vacation.