Thread:Tavisource/@comment-59335-20140630195711/@comment-59335-20140701150235

This logic doesn't make any sense at all, he is credited as Root Beer Guy in the credits, what he was called before then should not matter because before then he was a nameless character. The point of an article should be to convey as much canonical information about character as possible, nothing about the name "Candy Person 28" is canon, it has never been used once in the show, in fact that name Candy Person 28 is never used once in the article outside of the title, the way I see it, the name "Candy Person 28" is nothing more than trivia that should probably only be mentioned in some notation at the bottom of the article. I think you are getting too hung up on technicalities to allow the article in question to convey as much useful and relevent information as possible.