Category talk:Candidates for deletion

'Please use this page to discuss pages that have been labelled for deletion. When posting your thoughts on an article getting deleted or not, please precede your post with'' *, *, or *. To remove your vote, use the unvoting template like this:. Voting ends for a discussion once four days has passed and no one has voted (except during ties). Unless five days pass and the vote is unanimous, then the vote ends.'''

Archives

Commander and Private

 * This was suggested for merging, I have no opinion one way or the other. Anyone else? 20:28, May 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * "They are not characters in Adventure Time as they are an aspect of the movie". Okay, then... move the page to "Movie actors"? -- Luminoth.png Sky  Ing.png 20:34, May 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * Just rename it? I think I could get behind that, sure. 13:19, June 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Same as feli, just rename it 1415678.png 17:16, June 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ditto. Keep it, but perhaps rename. True Sephiroth 18:10, June 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * We're suggesting a list of movie actors, then? A list of movies seems to make more sense to me.
 * The Commander and Private have no role in Adventure Time that isn't defined by Heat Signature. If we're trying to keep articles interesting this seems to cause a problem: either the page for Heat Signature would intentionally ignore information about the Commander and Private so there is something interesting to say on their page, or the Commander and Private page would be redundant to the Heat Signature page - which is uninteresting and unnecessary.
 * I realize you could say the same thing about Plum Frog being on the episode article for "Memories of Boom Boom Mountain" for instance. However, the Commander and Private are (as far as we know) the only main characters in Heat Signature and therefore obviously worthy of mention in the article for the movie. The Plum Frog has an unmemorable role in "Memories of Boom Boom Mountain," and therefore belongs elsewhere.

An article having its own page doesn't mean it's important, it means it doesn't neatly belong in another article.
 * FPsig1.png Flame   Prince  Finn FPsig2.png 01:14, June 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * - well on that note... I'll retract my vote and change it to merge if that is ok? I like that idea a bit better and would choose to have them on a page for movies. True Sephiroth 01:43, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes it is ok, that is why there is an unvote template. 13:15, June 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * This is well beyond the waiting period, but I am adamant that there is no good reason these should be considered Adventure Time characters. Renaming it to clarify that they are in a movie doesn't get them out of the characters category, which is what I am arguing isn't valid. For reference...


 * The movie |. Twister (1996) does not credit Jack Nicholson as one of the actors, despite the fact that he is in |. The Shining (1980) and The Shining is shown in Twister. A show within a show is not credited by its actors.


 * I suppose you could argue that because Heat Signature isn't a real movie and is made up for the fictitious world of AT, its characters are an aspect of AT in that they are characters designed for the show - regardless of their place in the continuity of AT or how they are recognized by other characters. That is sensible. They are characters designed for AT, and technically they are AT characters, but I don't care much for that reasoning because it doesn't address the point that you would either intentionally leave information out of the Heat Signature article in favor of the "Movie Actors" article or make a redundant article.


 * Furthermore, they have no official artwork on the page (I assume that is because we don't have any), the "commander" is never addressed as such in show, and why don't they have their own separate articles if they are characters? (this acknowledges that their significance is stuck with the movie, I note) "Movie actors" would have to include the Gingerbread Actor, the Love Kaboom actors, and possibly others I'm forgetting.


 * In my view, doing anything but putting these actors on the Heat Signature (movie) page is sloppy. I am not suggesting we simply delete the information, I am saying it should be merged because the articles are inescapably connected with one another.


 * PS: Gingerbread Actor should also be merged with Gingerbread man movie for similar reasons. Look at those two articles - really?


 * FPsig1.png Flame   Prince  Finn FPsig2.png 00:57, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * The Bleep Blop?! Someone ended up making a character page for the Gingerbread Man Actor?! I recall changing the image for the movie itself. I honestly see no reason for the actor to have is own page. I still stand by my decision to merge commander and Private into Heat Sig since they are a part of that. That same should be the same for The gingerbread actor. Sephy L.png True   Sephiroth Sephy R.png 01:04, July 3, 2012 (UTC)


 * This is principally ridiculous. The amount of time a character is on screen is currently not one of the mentioned criteria involved in determining whether or not the character is worthy of it's own article, and yet Gingerbread Actor has been merged with the movie he has a role in. I will note that this is the exact same situation, but for some reason we're keeping the article for this movie's actors?


 * I'm going to end the vote as a keep if nobody responds to this, but I'd like to be very clear - to act in this manner means we either don't have a policy or we are decidedly acting without regard to it. FPsig1.png Flame   Prince  Finn FPsig2.png 23:35, July 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * I believe the biggest particular problem is the fact that barely anyone votes for these. Perhaps it should be made into announcements? Regardless, from what I view... the same people voting are generally the ones that contributes to articles a vast majority of the time. It really doesn't make any sense. I'm still for merging this article because it doesn't make a lick of sense to have them separate. Sephy L.png True   Sephiroth Sephy R.png 23:41, July 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * That wouldn't work, there are too many issues popping up here and people would get annoyed by all the messages. 17:42, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

Slug People

 * They're clearly a species in Ooo and played a notable role in the episode. At the same time, all the information on the Slug People page will just be a restatement of the appearance description of the two known Slug People that is already in the article.

I don't think that it's necessary to delete this page on account of keeping track of all species. All species articles are inherently going to be a bit redundant to their members in appearance, I don't see this as being different. It's not that interesting, sure, but many other species articles aren't, too. In short, Slug People are a notable species even if we've only seen two. We need to figure out what is species worthy and what is not, still.  Flame   Prince  Finn  00:29, June 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * We can merge this and snail people into a new species page to reduce redundant pages. Especially since there are only two people in this species listing. It can be titled 'Gastropod People' or 'Mollusk People' since that is what they technically are. This would also resolve the vote further up for snail people. Or simply just the species name so we can list everything that appears in the show instead of just people. True Sephiroth 22:44, June 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * I suggested a molluscan article, that way both snail and slug are on the same page. Honestly, I am still weirded out that it should be deleted. Since this wiki seems to want to keep track of everything lol. -- Bunai82 (talk) 22:47, June 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * I too found this curious.
 * I guess a Mollusk People article would be okay for brevity, but there are apparently ~85000 known mollusks and I imagine that snails and slugs are differentiated in real world species terms. I guess I don't know why we would merge when the two species distinguish themselves from one another? It seems similar to not distinguishing the Antelope and the deer to me. FPsig1.png Flame   Prince  Finn FPsig2.png 04:44, June 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * While there are ~85000 known mollusks on Earth in the year 2012 there are only two (three if you count sizing differences) known mollusks on Earth in the year ~3000 13:00, June 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * All I'm saying is that the differentiation between Slug and Snail is pretty significant. If we're going to user real-world scientific terms I have some minor qualms with ignoring the rest of the real-world implications.


 * It seems that we distinguish some species the same or different arbitrarily: Hug Wolves were accepted as a species article even though they fall under the umbrella term "Wolf Men." I think this is a very similar issue. If this is voted to merge, then I'd like to reopen discussion for Hug Wolves for the sake of uniformity.
 * FPsig1.png Flame   Prince  Finn FPsig2.png 19:23, June 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * The word 'accepted' is used loosely in your statement.
 * Ages ago I grouped all the non-significant sentient animals into a species called Metazoan People, I am for this simpler Mollusk People if we have to have any species article for them at all.
 * 13:17, June 14, 2012 (UTC)


 * I would agree that if this does get passed to merge we should also consider merging Hug-Wolves and Why Wolves in to Wolf Men... and honestly... I don't see why that wasn't done awhile back. Sephy L.png True   Sephiroth Sephy R.png 06:54, June 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * I just don't see a clear point where we draw the line as to what should and should not be grouped together. I said "accepted" in the sense that the vote was passed to keep the article. FPsig1.png Flame   Prince  Finn FPsig2.png 11:33, June 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * True, it wasn't done because there was an admin who was very adamant about keeping the Hug-Wolf species article. 13:08, June 21, 2012 (UTC)

Okay, so we clearly don't have a distinct plan for how to merge these articles. This is in my opinion all the more reason to keep them separate, but I guess I'll leave that to you. Point being, we need to decide how to merge them if we're going to do it. And endvote should mean it is time to take action regarding the article, and apparently that isn't the case here.

So what do we do?  Flame   Prince  Finn  23:32, July 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * What indeed. 19:00, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

Lorraine
with Birds per Felinoel's suggestion.  EvergreenFir  18:09, August 10, 2012 (UTC)

Merging is fine :D. Here is a pic if you don't merge it.

2:12, August 11, 2012 (UTC)

No way. She is not that minor at all. She played important roles in the episodes plot and had a lot of screentime. I am surprised something like this would be discussed... -- Sky  18:18, August 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * Then we need to beef up that article a lot. It's only a few lines now. Personally, I don't care if it stays or gets merged, but if it stays it needs lots of improvement imho.  EvergreenFir   18:24, August 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, for some reason to takes a while for some pages to contain as much info as needed. The Evil Monster had a case similar to this... -- Shrub.PNG Sky Kim.png 18:28, August 10, 2012 (UTC)

She was a supporting character in an episode and had several lines. That alone should be enough to keep the page. Also, since it's now established that Finn & Jake have a chicken, I wouldn't be surprised if she makes a few cameos. I say let it sit for a while and revisit if the page remains as it is. Lailokentheyeti (talk) 18:34, August 10, 2012 (UTC)

She may be dinosaur bones but we shouldn't bury her with the unimportant fossils.LuckyDay (talk) 19:22, August 10, 2012 (UTC)

Article's info is too little, like the other Bird chars, this should be merged. She appeared only in one episode recently, I think she left the Tree Fort (xD) after she got off the barrel and the chances of her reappearances or even just cameos are not that high.

 RGL Victor   The Great   19:57, August 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * Er, if you read what was said above, there would be no reason to say the info is "too little." If there is another reason why you said that, explain. -- Shrub.PNG Sky Kim.png 19:59, August 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * You should keep that on another post instead of one. Also, it does not matter if she only appeared in one episode, and may never appear again. Does this mean Gummy should not have his own page? Remember... Lorraine has lived in the Tree Fort for a while, so she could return later, anyway. -- Shrub.PNG Sky Kim.png 20:25, August 10, 2012 (UTC)


 * For the record it is the practice here to vote keep, delete, or merge. "Oppose" doesn't say your view on the article without context. At any rate, I agree this article doesn't need to be merged. The Birds page is meant for unnamed birds, I believe. 07:05, August 11, 2012 (UTC)


 * People... not only she was an important supporting character, the exgirlfriend of BMO, and in the end the culprit of hiding the sock, as well as the antagonist of the episode, but more important than all that, i dont see the useless and pretty unimportant filler characters of Lieutenant Whiskers and Officer Meow getting kicked off of their own personal waste of space pages so why the hate againts that chicken did her evil ways strick too close to home? yes she was mean but hey that is part of her character. Doomroar (talk) 00:35, August 12, 2012 (UTC)


 * She was a part of the episode. Why would you even consider trying to remove this? Ferbot11 (talk) 18:57, August 13, 2012 (UTC)


 * She played a larger roll that Cat (Hug Wolf)... and was vital to the story and possibly to BMO's insanity lol. Keep it... there is no reason to delete or merge. Sephy L.png True   Sephiroth Sephy R.png 19:24, September 9, 2012 (UTC)


 * No she didn't, she played no role whatsoever, she could have been a chair and nothing would have changed. 19:02, November 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * What do you mean? Sure she was just a normal chicken, but there is still info about the fake relationship between her and BMO. What is wrong with that info? -- Marceline on I Remember You promo art.png Sky Ice King on I Remember You  promo art.png 19:14, November 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * I mean that she could have been a chair and she would be exactly the same. 19:31, November 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * I know that, but she was at least a living thing and had a lot of screentime. Even if she was a chair, why would that be a reason to delete it (in this case since a chair is not a bird)? I think of it as being the same as Hambo. Hambo is probably a random name Marceline gave to the toy, like how BMO named Lorraine. Marceline played make-believe with Hambo like the way BMO did with Lorraine. Am I wrong about anything? -- Marceline on I Remember You promo art.png Sky Ice King on I Remember You  promo art.png 19:45, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

Arm creatures, Tongue, and Eye
Hm... this seems to be a similar case to the Shadow Horse. I would say that we count them as objects instead, but they are not inanimate, which does not make them objects, but characters, instead. I do not remember when it was explained that they are extensions of the Ice King that Ricardio made, though. Ricardio said that his new body is made from the Ice King. -- Sky 03:49, August 31, 2012 (UTC)


 * Perhaps they should be considered aspects of whatever place they were in. All three are definitive aspects of certain rooms, so it would make some sense to treat them as "trials" of sorts, as we do with Joshua's dungeon. 04:01, August 31, 2012 (UTC)

Technically they're all one thing. They're parts of the organic dungeon that Ricardio built in the Black Ice cave. I don't think it was ever specifically explained that they were parts of the Ice King (though he was hooked up to them via his chest-hole), but in the context of that place they are more like objects than creatures. There should be a single page for the cave/dungeon with these things included in it. 04:40, August 31, 2012 (UTC)


 * I do not think the dungeon was hooked up to Ice King, but either way, it was decided on chat that a page should be made for the cave and have all the character pages merged with it as subsections, kind of like what you said. -- Jake getting pulled on by candy kids special pose.png Finn with brain outline special model.png 05:25, August 31, 2012 (UTC)


 * seems to be the best option in my own opinion since they were part of the cave... but they could also be considered part of the ice king or Ricardio. Sephy L.png True   Sephiroth Sephy R.png 22:09, September 11, 2012 (UTC)


 * Hooked up to? These guys were the Ice King, they were grown from his body and Ricardio even said so. 19:13, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

Category:Art by JG Quintel, Art by Andy Ristaino, etc.
There are categories for art by JG Quintel, Andy Ristaino, David Smith, and Ian Jones-Quartey. Each of these categories only has 1 member. Someone merge them with Category: Art by Adventure Time Staff.67.209.253.199 17:51, September 23, 2012 (UTC)

I don't really mind either way, but I want to point out that if (if) we start categorizing images, these categories could be used for that. 21:23, September 23, 2012 (UTC)

if we start categorizing images then these images should go under Art by Adventure Time Staff, instead of each image in its own category. Articles don't come one to a category, neither should images.67.209.253.199 21:48, September 26, 2012 (UTC)

Category:Nominated
I agree with what Cornprone states on the category's talk page. I feel that this is unneeded and unwanted. Considering that 5 articles are nominated per month, this category will get large fairly quickly. Also, an article does not need any qualifications to become nominated, so a really bad article, for example, could be nominated as long as it's one of the first 5 nominated; This suggests that a nominated article is not necessarily anything special. this is basically a much more broad, low quality, highly populated version of the Featured category.  [ SaberSworn] [ Talk][ Contributions]</ul> 17:31, September 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * I have retracted my argument. I was confused about what the category was for. I actually support this. <ul class="wikia-menu-button" style="list-style: none; margin:0px"> [ SaberSworn] <ul style="list-style: none; border-radius:4px; border-top-right-radius: 1px; border-top-left-radius: 1px; margin:0px">[ Talk]</li>[ Contributions]</li></li></ul></li></ul> 17:34, September 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * I think I'm confused now too. What is the category for? 17:44, September 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * It's just for articles currently up for nomination, which can be read here. For some reason, I thought it was for every article that had been nominated before. <ul class="wikia-menu-button" style="list-style: none; margin:0px"> [ SaberSworn] <ul style="list-style: none; border-radius:4px; border-top-right-radius: 1px; border-top-left-radius: 1px; margin:0px">[ Talk]</li>[ Contributions]</li></li></ul></li></ul> 19:45, September 28, 2012 (UTC)

If the goal is to show people what articles/images/etc. are nominated, the Nominated template does that already by linking directly to the voting page. The Nominated category is just an unorganized list of pages from all 3 categories, which isn't very informative. 21:44, September 28, 2012 (UTC)

The Autumn Society
This isn't directly related to AT and is not official art. It is not appropriate for the wiki. <ul class="wikia-menu-button" style="list-style: none; margin:0px"> [ SaberSworn] <ul style="list-style: none; border-radius:4px; border-top-right-radius: 1px; border-top-left-radius: 1px; margin:0px">[ Talk]</li>[ Contributions]</li></li></ul></li></ul> 19:50, October 8, 2012 (UTC) I've already voiced my opinion on the article's talk page. 20:20, October 8, 2012 (UTC)

Boneyard Kingdom

 * With all the Formspring citation policing that's been happening lately, I'm actually surprised this hasn't come up yet. I believe that this is a case in which we shouldn't consider Formspring information canon. Heck, I'll even directly address everything he said:
 * 1) "MrMuto" Adam Muto doesn't control what is and isn't canon on the show on the same level that, say, Pen does. He's just a storyboarder/creative director and is more limited in his "canon power," if you will. His information is therefore unreliable here.
 * 2) "The Boneyard Kingdom or something." It seems like a name that he made up on the spot. Oh, what the heck. It is a name he made up on the spot.
 * 3) "I'm not sure." He doesn't know. Why is the information automatically confirmed?
 * 4) "It hasn't come up yet." He even directly said that it hasn't come up yet, so why are we already creating a page? This is called jumping the gun. I once made a "Fiona and Cake 2" page based on production information by Andy, and that got deleted because I was jumping the gun, and I understand that. What I don't understand is how this page is still up.

Please delete this page. — <tt> <span style="text-shadow: cyan 0 0 0.25em, cyan 0 0 0.25em;">RootSword (talk)</tt> ♪♫ 04:27, October 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * One more thing: I don't consider the "Princess Monster Wife" appearance a good argument to keep the page. The kingdom still doesn't have a known, proper name. — <tt> <span style="text-shadow: cyan 0 0 0.25em, cyan 0 0 0.25em;">RootSword Root_sword.png(talk)</tt> ♪♫ 04:43, October 11, 2012 (UTC)

13:23, October 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * Per Root.


 * Agreed. It's pretty obvious Muto wasn't really committing to the name; he was just giving an example of what her kingdom could be.


 * While I would usually side with Formspring answers needing to be removed, this is just a silly article that affects nothing, no real reason to remove it imo since nothing else has to do with it. 16:40, October 15, 2012 (UTC)


 * I forgot all about this page. I say we delete it. I don't think it should be kept just because it affects nothing, because most Formspring info affects nothing by keeping it either. An entire page should be no different. It having to do with almost nothing else a good reason either, that seems to be another reason to delete it, actually. -- <span style="background: black; border: solid 4px blue; -moz-box-shadow: 0 0 0px 0px silver; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 0px 30px black; box-shadow: 0 0 8px 5px black;">Marceline on I Remember You promo art.png Sky Ice King on I Remember You  promo art.png 18:45, October 21, 2012 (UTC)

The Wand (Object)
It's the central item to the short. There's barely any good reason to get rid of it. — <tt> <span style="text-shadow: cyan 0 0 0.25em, cyan 0 0 0.25em;">RootSword (talk)</tt> ♪♫ 21:09, October 14, 2012 (UTC)

That's what the episode is all about :T 12:41, October 16, 2012 (UTC)

Pretty important in my book.

<span style="background-image:-moz-radial-gradient(black, gray, black, red, firebrick);background-image:-webkit-radial-gradient(black, gray, black, red, firebrick);border:20px double silver; border-radius:10ex;"> Let <span style="border-bottom:1px ; cursor:help; color:red;" title="CLICK EITHER ONE, YOU'LL LIKE WHAT YOU FIND">The <span style="border-bottom:1px ; cursor:help; color:white;" title="ARE YOU CLICKING THEM?">Games <span style="border-bottom:1px ; cursor:help; color: #FF4040;" title="If you're not clicking the images, you need some help my friend">Begin 16:43, October 15, 2012 (UTC)

It was a main part of the short, just like Root Sword said Ferbot11 (talk) 14:57, October 21, 2012 (UTC)

Party With The Chief

 * This also goes for all background music; I think, rather than deleting the pages, they should be merged into a single page for background music. The music is created specifically for Adventure Time episodes, there are mp3s of some of the songs uploaded by the artists, and some of the songs do have extra info aside from just episode and scene. 01:51, October 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah I wish it was that easy, but it isn't. 19:06, October 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * The discussions you linked seem to be on a slightly different subject. This isn't about minor songs (like 8 Glasses Song) it's about the instrumental music that was created specifically for the show to be played in the background of certain scenes. It's very easy to distinguish; recently, while going through all the music pages, I've added them to their own category here. 17:47, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * I think that minor instrumentals with a few words and minor instrumentals would count as pretty much the same thing. 17:29, October 22, 2012 (UTC)

Alternate Universe Finn
15:39, October 25, 2012 (UTC) And no to Huckleberry Finn... (=_= ) -- Bunai82 (talk) 15:51, October 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * Even though this is an "alternate form" of him, he's still a separate entity from the regular Finn (presumably), therefore, keep the pages separated for now. Additionally, we can't exactly say that that lady is the mother of regular Finn (I don't think). — <tt> <span style="text-shadow: cyan 0 0 0.25em, cyan 0 0 0.25em;">RootSword Root_sword.png(talk)</tt> ♪♫ 07:11, October 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * KEEP IT! hes different184.79.32.251 14:25, October 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * I think we should merge this page to Finn's original page. <span style="padding-left:15px;background-color:grey;border:4px dotted black;SUBST:border-radius|1em 0em 0em 1em"> BOGEYMAN Bogeyman.png 07:36, October 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * I think it should be in Finn's page.
 * I think it should be in Finn's page, in "Disguises and alternate forms". 2000 - The futuristic sound of Balloon Music (talk) 07:54, October 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * Didn't realize the possibility of him being a different person. 18:56, November 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Until more is revealed just redirect the page to Finn.
 * Until more is revealed just redirect the page to Finn.
 * Psh no way, you know he is being Huckleberry Finn. 19:06, October 25, 2012 (UTC)

19:10, October 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * I think we should keep it until we see how long this storyline goes. If they keep it up for a few episodes, probably best to keep it. If it ends next episode, then merge.<ul class="wikia-menu-button" style="list-style: none; margin:0px">[ EvergreenFir] <ul style="list-style: none; border-radius:4px; border-top-right-radius: 1px; border-top-left-radius: 1px; margin:0px">[ Talk]</li>[ Contributions]</li></ul></li></ul>
 * I don't think it's clear yet whether he is the same entity as the normal Finn or not. 02:39, October 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * 03:04, October 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * We don't know if that is the same Finn from Ooo or a different entity altogether. We really don't have enough information to decide either way. I say we wait the two weeks for season five to start before we make any decision. Until then, we should keep the article. - Alchemical (talk) 03:52, October 26, 2012 (UTC)


 * Although AUF is a very minor character, we need to wait until we see what he does in Season 5 before we make any major decisions about the page. It just wouldn't be fair.
 * agreed with the last person up here Animaltamer7 (talk) 07:44, October 27, 2012 (UTC)Animaltamer7Animaltamer7 (talk) 07:44, October 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * We need to keep this. He could end up being a totally different person than Finn PeppermintButler77 (talk) 02:15, October 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * A.U. Finn is a different person than normal Finn. Unless he plays a very minor role in the episodes, we should have a separate article for him. For example, if he's only going to say five lines than we can merge him with normal Finn's article. But if he plays an actual part in the plot, have a separate page. Herkte (talk) 22:33, October 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * They are both technically the same person. -- <span style="background: black; border: solid 4px blue; -moz-box-shadow: 0 0 0px 0px silver; -webkit-box-shadow: 0 0 0px 30px black; box-shadow: 0 0 8px 5px black;">Marceline on I Remember You promo art.png Sky Ice King on I Remember You  promo art.png 02:32, November 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * They are different, no merge.

17:38, November 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * He is just the same with Finn --Juvia_Lockser.png 03:44, November 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * They are different enough to be able to have full pages on their own accord. 22:01, November 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * They are the same, but different. <span style="cursor:help; color:steelblue;" title="For the glory of Kanavan!">ᚱ<span style="background-color:royalblue; border:3px groove midnightblue;display:inline; border-radius:3ex; -webkit-border-radius:2em 0em 2em 0em; -moz-border-radius:2em 0em 2em 0em;">RGL sigi 1.png<span style="background-image:-webkit-linear-gradient(right, royalblue, royalblue); background-image:-moz-linear-gradient(right, royalblue, royalblue); border:3px groove navy;"> <font face="Old English Text MT">RGL Victor   <font face="New Times Roman">The Great  RGL sigi 2.png <span style="cursor:help; color:black;" title="Hehehehe... So you're here to pick a fight with a legend...">♫ 00:19, November 3, 2012 (UTC)

Fionna's dress

 * Not important enough. — <tt> <span style="text-shadow: cyan 0 0 0.25em, cyan 0 0 0.25em;">RootSword Root_sword.png(talk)</tt> ♪♫ 01:31, October 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * ^Ditto. 01:50, October 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ditto Ditto. Heh heh. this is like making a page for finns shorts PeppermintButler77 (talk) 02:17, October 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree it's not important and the article itself is only a sentence. ThebigOfan 02:27, October 29, 2012 (UTC)

Red Flower

 * It is just fire. We don't have an article on grapes called "purple whatevers." — 00:43, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ha, nice reasoning, made me laugh. 13:47, October 30, 2012 (UTC)

Brown Bird

 * He's already mentioned on the Birds article, where he rightfully belongs, due to being a background character who appeared for six seconds. This article includes a short, redundant Appearance section and an unneeded Quotes section, in attempts to make the article longer. Delete, please! — 01:31, November 1, 2012 (UTC)


 * Agree with RootSword --Juvia_Lockser.png 03:32, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

Chip Dip Triple Flips Are Hip, Party With The Chief
These two are nominated for deletion due to being minor background songs, but before I deleted them I wanted to know what to do with pages like these, as more background songs will undoubtedly come up in the future. Should there be just one page for all background musics, or should they not be on the wiki at all? :p  Waddle D33  <font color="midnightblue">Talk Contribs ಠ_ಠ  00:34, November 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * This is being discussed up here. — 01:28, November 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13:37, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

Adventure Time Movie
I don't think it should be deleted because Pen ward says there will be a adventure time movie.Juno322 (talk) 04:03, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

Engagement Ring Princess' crown
For this article, it really made an important role in actually activating the Enchiridion in "The Lich," alongside with the different jewels included. So without those gems we wouldn't have really finished that episode, so, it is best not to delete it. 13:22, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

*Jjw247 (talk) 21:55, November 2, 2012 (UTC)Jjw247