Category talk:Candidates for deletion

'Please use this page to discuss pages that have been labelled for deletion. '

'When posting your thoughts on an article getting deleted or not, please precede your post with'' *, *, or *. To remove your vote, use the unvoting template like this:. To make a neutral statement put. To make a comment put .''' Voting ends for a discussion once four days has passed and no one has voted (except during ties)'''. Unless five days pass and the vote is unanimous, then the vote ends.'''

Archive -01 02 03 04

Still open for discussion - 4/17/13
{{Scroll box|content=

Party With The Chief (and other songs/music/little diddies)

 * This also goes for all background music; I think, rather than deleting the pages, they should be merged into a single page for background music. The music is created specifically for Adventure Time episodes, there are mp3s of some of the songs uploaded by the artists, and some of the songs do have extra info aside from just episode and scene. 01:51, October 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah I wish it was that easy, but it isn't. 19:06, October 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * The discussions you linked seem to be on a slightly different subject. This isn't about minor songs (like 8 Glasses Song) it's about the instrumental music that was created specifically for the show to be played in the background of certain scenes. It's very easy to distinguish; recently, while going through all the music pages, I've added them to their own category here. 17:47, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * I think that minor instrumentals with a few words and minor instrumentals would count as pretty much the same thing. 17:29, October 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * On SpongeBob wiki they have one page for music or short 'diddies' that were in an episode. -- Bunai82 (talk) 16:15, November 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * How do they decide which is what though? 16:42, November 12, 2012 (UTC)


 * You'll have to ask whoever runs the wiki or edits the pages. I am not a continuous contributor there but I have helped out with vandals and such.
 * List 1 / List 2 -- Bunai82 (talk) 00:19, November 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * kay. 15:02, November 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * They apparently do it differently than you thought. 20:52, November 16, 2012 (UTC)

After reading that, even I don't know what you're talking about.

All I gave an example that the Spongebob wiki places short songs on a list.

I never stated they do it better or know what they are doing, because I don't contribute there a lot. A list of short songs should be obvious. Jake singing 'big liver' vs 'lava man' for comparison. -- Bunai82 (talk) 21:08, November 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * They say they don't do that though? 21:12, November 16, 2012 (UTC)


 * Songs should keep their own pages, but background music should all be merged.
 * Whoever you are, please remember to sign your posts. 14:13, December 10, 2012 (UTC)

Since felinoel confused himself. This is what I was referring to List of Short songs and List of Associated Production Music. These are linked to as Examples in reference to the above conversation. -- Bunai82 (talk) 22:11, April 8, 2013 (UTC)

Fire Lion‏‎

 * They played a semi-major role in the first issue of the Fionna and cake mini series. --King Chubzhac, Boss of YOU (talk) 02:44, January 3, 2013 (UTC)


 * I say we should merge it with Flambits, if Fire Lion is really the correct name. 02:49, January 3, 2013 (UTC)


 * We should keep them separate because, as far as we know, they're two separate creatures. As Flambits are talking creatures but Fire Lions are just flaming lions as far as we know. Also, we have not seen a flambit big enough to ride yet. --King Chubzhac, Boss of YOU (talk) 03:04, January 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * same reason with FTHG Happy the neko-mander (talk) 05:31, January 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * same reason with FTHG Happy the neko-mander (talk) 05:31, January 3, 2013 (UTC)


 * There is no reason to merge the pages. In addition to what I've already said, read the character section of the Manual of Style. --King Chubzhac, Boss of YOU (talk) 17:33, January 3, 2013 (UTC)

Lumpy Space Prince's Party

 * Nothing special happened at the event. Also, it was just a regular party, not one that gets repeated every year. Those kind of events deserve a page, but this one doesn't.--TheMostBoringManInTheWorld (talk) 11:14, March 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * No, it's still a memorable moment. If something should be deleted, it should be you. --HeartfeltProdigy (talk) 11:35, March 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * BillStef (talk) 11:42, March 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Seems pointless to have a whole article for it. -- Yuzura  (talk)  14:19, March 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * I just noticed something. There are other pages about events similar to this that are unneeded (ex.: Princess Bubblegum's science concert). So I propose we merge this pages. --TheMostBoringManInTheWorld (talk) 11:05, March 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh I like that idea, we did something similar to all of the magic spell articles and just merged them all into one article on tons of spells. 17:25, March 26, 2013 (UTC)

Time Waits for No One
More info should be added, but all the bonus comic stories are on separate pages from their issues.Party Kat (talk) 19:49, April 3, 2013 (UTC)

I think all the mini comics should be merged into one article. BillStef (talk) 22:57, April 3, 2013 (UTC)

--King Chubzhac, Boss of YOU (talk) 18:56, April 6, 2013 (UTC)

I agree with BillStef on this. TheMostBoringManInTheWorld (talk) 02:14, April 7, 2013 (UTC)

Mirror Finns
This should be in the Finn article, in the "disguises and alternate forms" section. Party Kat (talk) 00:04, April 12, 2013 (UTC)

TheMostBoringManInTheWorld (talk) 12:47, April 12, 2013 (UTC)

The Disguises/Alternate forms section is for the disguises and alternate forms of the singular entity named Finn. The mirror Finns are entities separate from this entity, just like Farmworld Finn. 20:16, April 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * Alternate forms can stand for alternate Finn of an alternate universe. You see, separate entities that represent Finn in another dimension are alternate forms (alternate forms, alternate universes--get it?). That's why I propose to merge the Mirror Finns with Finn's page (also Farmworld Finn, but that's another discussion. 180px-Chrell btts.PNG  Being boring is boring.  250px-2423266537 bb6495420e o.PNG 11:04, April 23, 2013 (UTC)


 * I excuse myself, my good man. I have just noticed that it has been decided to keep the Farmworld character articles the way they are. Since the the Mirror Finns are similar, they should be kept the way they are. 180px-Chrell btts.PNG  Being boring is boring.  250px-2423266537 bb6495420e o.PNG 12:14, April 26, 2013 (UTC)

}}

Unnamed Bug Princess
The page just needs more content. Being boring is boring.  18:03, April 25, 2013 (UTC)


 * This is trivia on Mini Queen page. All the princesses had a slightly different appearance in the "What is Life" episode.-- Bunai82 (talk) 17:42, May 1, 2013 (UTC)

Message Wall Greeting:User:Sesame Street Of Elmo Fan 2013
Of course. Being boring is boring.  18:03, April 25, 2013 (UTC)

Deleted. Waddle D33 Talk Contribs ಠ_ಠ  20:15, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

The Loch

 * Why was this recreated? It has no information and, same as before, there is no reason to have the page because we know nothing about the character besides it's "a kind of lake." BillStef (talk) 00:35, April 28, 2013 (UTC)

Oh whoops, just as I posted this it got deleted. Carry on. BillStef (talk) 00:36, April 28, 2013 (UTC)

Song (disambiguation)

 * Seriously? Disambiguation is used to separate articles with the same name. 180px-Chrell btts.PNG  Being boring is boring.  250px-2423266537 bb6495420e o.PNG 11:40, April 28, 2013 (UTC)


 * Having a category is enough, there is no need to have an entire page with every song listed. Also, they don't all have the same name so why is it a disambiguation. BillStef (talk) 14:24, April 28, 2013 (UTC)


 * Per above. Crystal Guardian.png Waddle D33  Talk Contribs ಠ_ಠ  20:15, April 29, 2013 (UTC)


 * Some people don't like to go through categories. I recreated the Songs page and listed the songs under their episode, this way it is more visible to see which episode it came from as well as the singers. More can be added at the top, for example who was the primary writer, did any songs win awards etc. -- Bunai82 (talk) 20:04, April 30, 2013 (UTC)

The lich theory of fionna + finn

 * Of course. 180px-Chrell btts.PNG  Being boring is boring.  250px-2423266537 bb6495420e o.PNG 16:16, April 28, 2013 (UTC)


 * BillStef (talk) 16:30, April 28, 2013 (UTC)

This talk page is to be used for pages that appear to be helpful or can be altered to fit the manual of style. -- Bunai82 (talk) 20:11, April 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * You guys don't have to take everything to this talk page, the admins can see spam pages. So just mark such pages for deletion and let it go.

Pendleton Ward's Adventure Time: The Movie

 * Seriously? BillStef (talk) 16:51, April 28, 2013 (UTC)

Proposing merge of Holo technology into one article

 * Since holographic technology has been appearing rather frequently when the episode requires it. I wanted to propose a merger of the following articles: Holo-message player, Holo-pendant, Holographic newspaper. I took notice of this after I finished the transcript for Crystals have Power and the first scene shown is Finn looking through a holographic book (which there is no article of). I think it would be good to contain the related content to one article and have it be more expansive than the current form. -- Bunai82 (talk) 07:02, May 3, 2013 (UTC)

I think this is a good idea, but I think we should keep the original pages to redirect to the new "Holo" page.

[ Bike (B1K3)]   [ Talk][ Contributions][ Blog] 08:40, May 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Um, B1k3 saying "delete" means deleting all the pages, not merging them. Of course merged pages get deleted. -- 180px-Chrell btts.PNG Being boring is boring.  250px-2423266537 bb6495420e o.PNG 16:26, May 3, 2013 (UTC)

Naturally many merged pages are redirected and their content placed on a different article. So technically, depending on the situation, the pages are not deleted. Same thing happened with the Lumpy Space areas, the little information they contained made it suitable to redirect the content to Lumpy Space. -- Bunai82 (talk) 17:01, May 3, 2013 (UTC)


 * OK. -- 180px-Chrell btts.PNG Being boring is boring.  250px-2423266537 bb6495420e o.PNG 06:48, May 4, 2013 (UTC)

It's a great suggestion. --   Being boring is boring.   06:49, May 4, 2013 (UTC)

Whoops. [ Bike (B1K3)]   <ul style="list-style: none; margin:0px">[ Talk]</li>[ Contributions]</li>[ Blog]</li></ul></li></ul> 09:48, May 5, 2013 (UTC)


 * Just waiting for more votes. Slow days. -- Bunai82 (talk) 14:02, May 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * Well since no one else is posting and it is now 2 weeks since my proposal, I will be merging. -- Bunai82 (talk) 20:02, May 21, 2013 (UTC)

Hole In The Earth

 * My page that i made, Hole In The Earth, is up for deletion because it's listed or linked to mushroom war. I believe it should not be deleted because it does not state any bad facts about the page, Mushroom War. Why would it be up for deletion when it does not state any bad or illegal facts disregarding one other's page? Some people put pages up for deletion to be cruel and ruin others. I spent a lot of time on this page, and I only use facts that I made myself and from the knowledge from previous research before the construction of this page, and should not be deletion or even up for deletion if it has not upset others. My page has very complex facts that tie together to make a fan fiction true statement, and should be allowed to stay on like the rest of every one else's pages. There are even worse and more troubling pages that should be worried about out there that upset others.why is mine being accused for no such of a fault? Is it because people want to take down beginner pages? Everyone deserves to start somewhere, especially when they haven't done anything against the rights of this website. I want that chance.
 * I already told you, the page is based on a theory. We don't post theories on Adventure Time Wiki. Your page could make as a blog or a sub-page, I already told you that on your talk page. -- 180px-Chrell btts.PNG  Being boring is boring.  250px-2423266537 bb6495420e o.PNG 03:16, May 7, 2013 (UTC)

1) Some people put pages up for deletion to be cruel and ruin others.
 * False, pages that are marked for deletion are done because they contribute nothing to the wiki as a whole. If someone finds it to be a problem then it is up to the admins to determine that after a community voting.

2) My page has very complex facts that tie together to make a fan fiction true statement, and should be allowed to stay on like the rest of every one else's pages.
 * You gave yourself away by using the term "Fan Fiction", meaning the page was created purely on theory of one person making a bunch of speculative statements. The page is not showing a neutral view, it is full of your theories and reasons for the crater. And everyone else's page goes through the same judgement and possible deletion processes.


 * As TheMostBoringManInTheWorld recommends this page should and likely will be moved to a blog space not a main content space. -- Bunai82 (talk) 03:42, May 7, 2013 (UTC) eta And of course I move it. So check under User blog:AdventureTimeOooNews/Hole In The Earth and speculate and type as much as you want. Just don't add any of this to the mainspace or it will be viewed as spam. -- Bunai82 (talk) 03:47, May 7, 2013 (UTC)

Candy Corn
Did Someone Deleted Pages

I have no idea what Miggy09222 meant by that...

I feel we should keep this page. 04:20, May 9, 2013 (UTC)

I thought there was an agreement that minor Candy People are put on the Candy People page. Since there's information about this guys there, there's no need for this page. --  Being boring is boring.   12:38, May 9, 2013 (UTC)

The whole candy people page need to be revamped anyway. -- Bunai82 (talk) 14:40, May 9, 2013 (UTC)

- Useless. ViolentPeacefulCatloverr (talk) 09:46, May 22, 2013 (UTC)

Voting for Deletion
This page should be deleted. If you shall spread news about something, you do not need to create a page about it. People create pages to add information about episodes and characters, etc. But not spreading news. Whoever made this needs to know that creating pages about anything not related to Adventure Time can be deleted and when he/she wants to spread news about something he/she should create a blog, not a new page.

  Christine  Kitty  19:54, May 11, 2013 (UTC)


 * Which page are you referring to?  03:30, May 22, 2013 (UTC)

Censorship of Adventure Time on Cartoon Network Brazil
Pretty sure that all of the claims are false. I checked The Monster to be sure as it had the most specific claim and it turned out to be false. Another user from Brazil says they are false too (see Talk:Censorship_of_Adventure_Time_on_Cartoon_Network_Brazil#Lie). 21:00, May 22, 2013 (UTC)

I just want to delete it out of annoyance. This wiki doesn't need Censorship pages unless they effect the North American airings. -- Bunai82 (talk) 21:15, May 22, 2013 (UTC)

There's already a Censorship for Australia page that has a long list of episodes trimmed, this page is untrustworthy and we don't need to start making pages for every single country that gets an episode edited. BillStef (talk) 11:53, May 23, 2013 (UTC)

Viva Video Incorperated
page has absolutely "nothing" on it -- 11:31, May 26, 2013 (UTC)

Viva Video Incorperated --    Being boring is boring.   12:34, May 26, 2013 (UTC)

Solar System
This page has nothing to do with Adventure Time apart from the small mentioning of the Land of Ooo and the martians on Mars. Moi, of course (talk) 09:06, May 31, 2013 (UTC)

Squeez-E-Mart boss
04:52, June 7, 2013 (UTC)

BillStef (talk) 11:38, June 12, 2013 (UTC)

Stone-skin potion
kEEP the stone skin P'oin it is relivent i n'ow my gramers bab that because my keeb'o damaged if y'ou g'ot a 'pr'ob'lir fix it d'o'nt' get read 'of it

Not sure the page is even about something canon. Even if, it's too minor. User who made it has horrendous grammar and spelling. 22:28, June 12, 2013 (UTC)

We have an article for "Magic nail", which is from the same episode. Unless we start creating a single page for these types of things, people will keep making individual ones with little information. -- Bunai82 (talk) 22:37, June 12, 2013 (UTC)

It's actually a legit thing and should definitely be kept. The grammar and spelling can be fixed. Doomsdaynger (talk) 02:16, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

With the edits and all, I see now it is legit. My bad. 05:18, July 8, 2013 (UTC)

Censorship of Adventure Time on Cartoon Network Australia
This page is full of conflicting edits and unverified information. We either need to have some manner of verification where the censorship is shown or the page should be removed. 04:58, June 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * The concept is valid, as long as at least 1 instance of censorship exists in these nations we should be discussing them. It's not a simple manner to "show" censorship when it involves the brief clipping of seconds of audio or animmation, and might require linking to YouTube videos analyzing these, or perhaps articles expounding on them. These are subtle things so we can't exactly expect glaring proof of them. We should just make a note that some censorship 'rumors' are issues we haven't verified ("unverified"), and make the verified rumours of censorship stand out as 'verified'. Not just delete things. Perhaps unverified rumours could be exported to the talk page and added back when we do verify them? +Yc 05:36, July 10, 2013 (UTC)

I just feel it is unnecessary. As I griped about many times: what is edited, censored, or changed in another country has no barring on U.S airings. Plus there is already a wiki dedicated to this. The only way I see this working for the wiki is if there is a page specifically to cover international edits in general, not just one place. Example Gumball wiki and FiM wiki. The Brazilian censorship page was deleted due to it being unreliable and pretty much the snowball effect of what could result in many more pages just like the Australian one.

I was happy when this edit was made and the information was transferred by Jerryjackson42 07:00, May 4, 2012‎. But then IP 110.55.88.54 08:56, June 30, 2012‎ went and restored the page without any discussion.

This could even just be a blog or forum. It just doesn't work as a mainspace article. -- Bunai82 (talk) 06:14, June 13, 2013 (UTC)


 * I assume 'barring' means 'bearing'. I don't think this wiki si solely about US airings though. It's about Adventure Time in general, including alterations that happen as it is exported, I assume. A generalized censorship overview page is fine, I don't oppose creating one, but if a mass of censorship exists in specific nations, having individual articles is fine for that too. We don't lose anything by that, we gain. It isn't harming anything. Shouldn't we have bigger constructive priorities here and less concern with deleting things? Improvement over trimming? +Yc 05:36, July 10, 2013 (UTC)

I agree with Bunai. And the Australians go crazy with censorship. 00:33, June 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * If they are 'going crazy with censorship' that makes it sound like you agree that censorship exists. If it exists, we should be documenting that, documenting what information is removed so that we have an idea of the different 'versions' of episodes that exist out there. It creates an entirely different continuity of understanding for people viewing these limited presentations in those nations. +Yc 05:36, July 10, 2013 (UTC)

Don't be so discriminating to other world countries. Maybe some Australians do not know about the wiki dedicated to the censorships and depend on this wiki for the details. Keep the page and stop being so discriminating to non- U.S users.  Adventuretimegurl123  00:40, June 18, 2013 (UTC)) This wiki can advertise the Censorship wiki just by linking to it. And I already suggested if there is to be an article about edits for international versions, then it should be a single article allowing all known countries not just one. -- Bunai82 (talk) 00:53, June 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * This is not about discrimination of a people or country. This is about an "article" focusing on one country's practices and having no purpose on this wiki.
 * what on earth do you mean by 'no purpose'? The purpose is very clear: to document censorship that was done to AT eps when aired in other countries. That is a very clear and important purpose. +Yc 05:36, July 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * I agree with ATG and it's not one country it's the whole Southeast Asia and Oceania. nuff said. ~ BH : The  Seductive  Bra ~ 04:03, August 6, 2013 (UTC)

The whole article is unreliable — different users write different type of information. They are often in conflict. There hasn't been any agreement in the article whatsoever.
 * Reliability issues are not a reason to delete a page, but rather to improve it. The concept of the page is quite sound. Conflicting edits can be resolved (aided by talk page discussion) by seeking out referencing. We could perhaps tag unreferenced statements and use reference coding for things we do have evidence for. A lack of agreement is not a reason to delete, but to problem-solve. Only by keeping these pages up can we keep them open to many editors who can improve them. +Yc 05:36, July 10, 2013 (UTC)

This Page has been built up for along time, and you can fix it by letting only admins' use it, and you must have permission to edit on it! So its kind of like, you must be trusted, I've seen it done on other wikis (i wont tell!) So hear me out! Let the page be kept! Peachmore (talk) 02:00, July 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * No idea what you are talking about. What page are you referring to? 02:07, July 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * Turns out she meant it for this section. Moving it. 02:13, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

articles like this show a lot of potential. While it is true we should strive to source and verify this a lot more, I don't think that means we should be simply deleting it. I suggest we put a note at the top "anything without a reference link has not yet been verified". As we find forms of evidence to verify that censorship occurred, we could insert reference tags. We should not risk losing this information if it may be true, censorship is a very serious issue we should be keeping track of on wikis. If not here, where else? It's the best way for the idea to get criticism and verification. +Yc 05:22, July 10, 2013 (UTC)

you can find my reason on the talk of the page. oh and Bunai if you want to comment on this, well it's not one country for goodness sake, it's the whole Southeast Asia and Oceania. ~ BH : The  Seductive  Bra ~ 04:03, August 6, 2013 (UTC)

Censorship of Adventure Time on Cartoon Network Brazil
These types of pages done individual don't need to be on the wiki. The Brazil page was deleted before for being unreliable. I am proposing an international page that explains edits rather than a single page that simply focuses on one country at a time. -- Bunai82 (talk) 15:17, July 7, 2013 (UTC)

05:18, July 8, 2013 (UTC)

I don't see the point in meshing together the various nations. A page per country is a lot easier. Adventure Time grows in popularity (and number of episodes) so if we jammed all nations and all episode censorships into 1 page it would grow too big. We should do a page per nation and organize them via a category instead. An international overview page could make sense in a while, with an abbreviated form of info, while the nation-specific pages could go into greater detail about it. If an admin ends deciding these pages do not belong in the mainspace, please at least them them survive by moving them to the forum or the userspace of their creator so that we can find the information and work on finding proper references so that some day they might be up to the standards you require. +Yc 05:25, July 10, 2013 (UTC)

Skateboard

 * Every single item that shows up on the show does not need a page. --King Chubzhac, Boss of YOU (talk) 04:13, June 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * It's stupid Doomsdaynger (talk) 02:16, July 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * Crystal Guardian.png Waddle D33  <font color="midnightblue">Talk Contribs ಠ_ಠ  04:33, July 8, 2013 (UTC) and also,
 * Crystal Guardian.png Waddle D33  <font color="midnightblue">Talk Contribs ಠ_ಠ  04:33, July 8, 2013 (UTC) and also,

Deleted.  Waddle D33  <font color="midnightblue">Talk Contribs ಠ_ಠ  04:33, July 8, 2013 (UTC)

Template:Keep

 * Redundant. We already have Template:VKeep.  02:07, July 5, 2013 (UTC)

Just mark minor stuff like this for deletion, it doesn't need a discussion because admins know what can be taken as spam. -- Bunai82 (talk) 18:00, July 6, 2013 (UTC)

Pizza Sassy's delivery car

 * As the delete template says, it is way too insignificant and minor to deserve its own article. There's only about a paragraph worth of information there. Crystal Guardian.png Waddle D33  <font color="midnightblue">Talk Contribs ಠ_ಠ  05:03, July 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * FancyTealGiraffe (talk) 15:12, July 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * FancyTealGiraffe (talk) 15:12, July 23, 2013 (UTC)

Unnecessary MO Articles
I feel like the only MO articles that should be allowed are: BMO, maybe CMO, DMO, and SMO. It seems like different MO articles are popping up everywhere. I think this morning there was even an MMO article. We need to cut these pages down. There's an article for EMO, who, granted, did play a very minor antagonist role. But he was on screen for about 4 seconds. Not exactly page-worthy. FMO wasn't even shown, and the LMO article is completely useless. "They appear to be betting over something." That's really helpful, alright. It's either have an article for every MO, (whether they played an important role or not), or only a couple main MOs. And having an article for every MO would result in articles with one sentence. FancyTealGiraffe (talk) 15:23, July 23, 2013 (UTC)

Agreed. The MOs listing does fine. I think people are this wiki are just eager to create articles just to have something to create. If more comes to these MOs then no problem creating article pages, but you can't do much with one line of text that is already repeated from the MOs listing. -- Bunai82 (talk) 16:47, July 23, 2013 (UTC)

Per all. LMO has two sentences and FMO doesn't even have anything but a picture. Unless there is more info that can be said about them other than what is on the MOs page, they should be deleted.

Waddle D33 <font color="midnightblue">Talk Contribs ಠ_ಠ  17:16, July 23, 2013 (UTC)

None of these articles are doing anything. There is a reason not every unnamed Candy Person has an article. I think only the MOs who played a minor role in the episode should have pages. The MO page takes care of the rest. 17:40, July 23, 2013 (UTC)

These articles are pretty much useless. TheMostBoringManInTheWorld  (talk)  04:11, July 24, 2013 (UTC)

It's basically like making articles for all the candy people. <ul class="wikia-menu-button" style="list-style: none; margin:0px">[ Bike (B1K3)]   <ul style="list-style: none; margin:0px">[ Talk]</li>[ Contributions]</li>[ Blog]</li></ul></li></ul> 04:43, July 24, 2013 (UTC)

I'm just gonna start redirecting. I'll put the voice information with the detail section. -- Bunai82 (talk) 22:50, July 24, 2013 (UTC) eta DMO and SMO don't have much either, those tables can hold a lot of summarized information. Them having voices doesn't give much wait to having a page. This is just in opinion if people like them then they can stay.

Bat

 * This character was named and therefore is good enough by our Wiki's standards to be in an article, mention this character in a Species article but do not delete. 17:31, July 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * I like this idea. TheMostBoringManInTheWorld   (talk)  02:05, July 26, 2013 (UTC)