Category talk:Candidates for deletion

'Please use this page to discuss pages that have been labelled for deletion. '

'When posting your thoughts on an article getting deleted or not, please precede your post with'' *, *, or *. To remove your vote, use the unvoting template like this:. To make a neutral statement put. To make a comment put .''' Voting ends for a discussion once four days have passed and no one has voted (except during ties)'''. Unless five days pass and the vote is unanimous, then the vote ends.'''

Archive - 01 02 03 04 05

Bat

 * This character was named and therefore is good enough by our Wiki's standards to be in an article, mention this character in a Species article but do not delete. 17:31, July 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * I like this idea. TheMostBoringManInTheWorld   (talk)  02:05, July 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * YUSH YUSH ~ BH : The  Seductive  Bra ~ 04:08, August 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok then if everyone seems to agree (and since it meets the wiki's standards for whether or not it can have an article), what species article do we merge it to? It isn't a rodent. 15:32, August 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure. Maybe flying creatures? TheMostBoringManInTheWorld   (talk)  05:31, August 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * That isn't really a species... 14:39, August 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, there are the Bat Bugs... TheMostBoringManInTheWorld   (talk)  10:57, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * That is more of a group character page than an actual species. 14:18, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * It would still make sense to merge it with the bat article. TheMostBoringManInTheWorld   (talk)  02:38, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * I disagree but that is neither here nor there. 19:49, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * Maybe on that species page  you were working on. By, the way, do I have the permission to edit it? I noticed some things and which I would like to fix.
 * lol no like two years ago I made that article and took the arduous task of merging all creatures into individual species, but then Cornprone stepped in and commented his not liking such a thing so I moved it to my userspace in lieu of deleting it. tbh Corn was right, anyways our current species page is just the species category. 13:26, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Kay den. TheMostBoringManInTheWorld   (talk)  14:06, Octomber 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * I say we make a page for all the animals that attend Finn and Jake's cave party and don't appear in a later episode: Party Worm, Amoeba, Centipede, Jellyfish, and Bat. We can call it "Party Animals" or something. We'd only lose 2 pages. Bellamybug (talk) 04:25, September 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * idk... we usually merge pages based on species... 13:49, September 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, here's a mock-up if anyone wants to take a look at it --Bellamybug (talk) 22:01, October 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * I like how you used the user template instead of the species template. 13:24, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * The only other instance of that happening, which I was and still am against, uses the character template. Forest_inhabitant 20:27, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * There's also Castle Staff. I was actually planning on using the character template for this as well (since they're not one distinct species). I think it's preferable to having a bunch of stubby articles for each character. --Bellamybug (talk) 20:59, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * That is weird, they are on the Candy People article, why do they get this article too? 12:58, October 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * That seems fine to me. TheMostBoringManInTheWorld   (talk)  14:06, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * Makes sense. 02:11, December 4, 2014 (UTC)

BAT - THIS DISCUSSION WAS NEVER SETTLED -- Bunai82 (talk) 22:48, June 16, 2014 (UTC) - PLEASE CONTINUE TO VOTE AND DISCUSS BELOW THIS LINE


 * Agreed User:Animaltamer709:03, July 19, 2014 (UTC)


 * lol why did i put keep 13:18 Wed Jan 21

Junktown

 * I propose that we should merge this with the farmworld article Pongox (talk) 21:42, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * There are articles of small areas that have only appeared once or twice that we still keep. Veggie Village is but one example. Why not let this be its own article, too? - Alchemical (talk) 02:10, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * TheMostBoringManInTheWorld  (talk)  10:55, August 29, 2013 (UTC)

JUNKTOWN - THIS DISCUSSION WAS NEVER SETTLED -- Bunai82 (talk) 22:48, June 16, 2014 (UTC) - PLEASE CONTINUE TO VOTE AND DISCUSS BELOW THIS LINE

Memerose the human (talk) 03:37, January 25, 2015 (UTC)
 * keep it as a separate article. User:Animaltamer709:04, July 19, 2014 (UTC)
 * Let Veggie Village redeem this page. 02:12, December 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * Strange how someone would create an account just to propose a merge. —Bellamybug (talk) 22:18, January 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * Should be a separate article, It's an important setting enough to have it's own page, even if it was only shown once.

Bagel

 * It was on screen for very short time (under ten seconds). Doesn't really need a page about it. BillStef (talk) 18:00, August 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * Definitely get rid of it. A useless stub that is remotely useful. 18:03, August 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * It is not a stub and was a humorous item in the show, no real reason to delete. 18:49, August 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * I don't see why it is useless. It's relevant and has no real reason to be deleted. -- Yuzura☆ 炎のマスタ ー 19:02, August 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * How about we merge all the food related articles? TheMostBoringManInTheWorld   (talk)  10:50, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * Possibly... can you mock up a mockup? 14:19, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * It'd be smart.... 14:21, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * Let's do it. There's plenty of food articles: Animal-shaped chicken nuggets, Apple Pie, Crystal Gem Apple, Finn cake, Flakies, Honey energy drink, Perfect sandwich, Royal tart, Softy Cheese, Yeeargh! Bellamybug (talk) 15:07, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * If I can change my vote, then I'll change it to Merge. It seems pretty smart to merge all food articles. 17:06, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * I agree, that'd be a good idea. BillStef (talk) 03:00, August 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * We should make a page for the non-candy living food items, like PB's drink, the sandwich, and the raisin. PIZZA BAGELS!!!  [[File:Free marceline icon by picklecheesepie-d32mn6i-1-.gif]] 12:13, September 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * But this bagel isn't living? 13:50, September 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * He made an error? TheMostBoringManInTheWorld   (talk)  14:04, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * What? The bagel is living when we see it move. Some food items may be alive, others are not. I personally don't think it matters much, but I agree a lot of the food articles are short and unnecessary so maybe merging the minor foods, living or non, into one article would be the best bet. Heeeeeeeeeeeere's   JOHNNY   !!!  15:46, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * Wow I don't remember it moving... I am going to have to rewatch that episode. If it is alive then yes it is a character and not an object. 13:08, October 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * Aw yes, I remember now, the Witch brought the bagel to life... TheMostBoringManInTheWorld   (talk)  18:25, October 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah... silly me. 18:36, October 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * [[file:Nostalgia_Critic_-_Adventure_Time_Vlogs_Witch's_Garden|300px]]
 * 04:08, December 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Doug makes a really good point in that Vlog that it really should be considered a legit "character" in the show. Although it may be minor, it still falls into the humor of the show, so I agree with Feli. Heeeeeeeeeeeere's   JOHNNY   !!!  21:32, December 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * Merging the food articles doesn't sound like such a good idea to me anymore. Bellamybug (talk) 00:06, May 5, 2014 (UTC)

BAGEL - THIS DISCUSSION WAS NEVER SETTLED -- Bunai82 (talk) 22:48, June 16, 2014 (UTC) - PLEASE CONTINUE TO VOTE AND DISCUSS BELOW THIS LINE


 * I say we should keep it. User:Animaltamer709:27, July 19, 2014 (UTC)
 * Agree with the merging of food articles! Memerose the human (talk) 03:40, January 25, 2015 (UTC)

The Sun

 * Meets the requirements for an article —Bellamybug (talk) 01:46, December 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * I'd say it's somewhat needed. 02:07, December 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * It does meet the requirements of an article, and regarding it's speaking line it appears more as a character that should have a page. However its just for scenery. It's not like we have a page for the moon or the clouds or anything like that.~ Maple Panda (talk) 02:46, January 15, 2015 (UTC)
 * If the moon and clouds gave inspirational speeches, they'd get pages, too. —Bellamybug (talk) 03:05, January 15, 2015 (UTC)